Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34827335›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Determination of Tetracycline, Oxytetracycline, Sulfadiazine, Norfloxacin, and Enrofloxacin in Swine Manure Using a Coupled Method of On-Line Solid-Phase Extraction with the UHPLC-DAD.

Mohamed S Gaballah, Xin Li, Zijia Zhang, Abdulaziz Al-Anazi, Hui Sun, Mostafa Sobhi, Mperejekumana Philbert, Mohamed A Ghorab, Jianbin Guo, Renjie Dong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Mohamed S GaballahBioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6064-5631
Xin LiBioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Zijia ZhangBioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Abdulaziz Al-AnaziDepartment of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University (KSU), P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.
Hui SunBioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5741-5413
Mostafa SobhiAgricultural and Bio-Systems Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21511, Egypt.
Mperejekumana PhilbertBioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Mohamed A GhorabOffice of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, DC 20004, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7880-965X
Jianbin GuoBioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Renjie DongBioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
China Agricultural University · CNAlexandria University · EGEnvironmental Protection Agency · USKing Saud University · SANational Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of various veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in animal husbandry raises serious concerns about the development of antibiotic resistance. Antibiotics such as tetracycline, oxytetracycline, sulfadiazine, norfloxacin, and enrofloxacin are the most frequently used antimicrobial compounds in animal husbandry and generate large eco-toxicological effects; however, they are still difficult to determine in a complex matrix such as swine manure. This study has developed an effective method for detecting five VAs in swine manure using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Diode Array Detector (UHPLC-DAD) coupled with on-line solid-phase extraction (SPE). The results show that the mobile phase of ACN/0.01 M oxalic acid was the optimum at pH 3.0. VAs in a swine manure matrix were extracted using solid extraction buffer solution (T3) with 97.36% recovery. Sensitivity, accuracy, and precision were also evaluated. The validity study showed good linearity (R

Indexed as

on-line SPEswine manureUHPLCveterinary antibiotics

Identifiers

PMID34827335
PMCPMC8615208
OpenAlexW3213794122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.