Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34827130›Full record

ArticleBiology2021

The Effects of Single or Combined Supplementation of Probiotics and Prebiotics on Growth Performance, Dietary Energetics, Carcass Traits, and Visceral Mass in Lambs Finished under Subtropical Climate Conditions.

Alfredo Estrada-Angulo, Octavio Zapata-Ramírez, Beatriz I Castro-Pérez, Jesús D Urías-Estrada, Soila Gaxiola-Camacho, Claudio Angulo-Montoya, Francisco G Ríos-Rincón, Alberto Barreras, Richard A Zinn, José B Leyva-Morales and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Blend of Essential Oils Plus Vitamin D3 Combined withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Effect of Combining a Prebiotic (Autolyzed Yeast fromAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alfredo Estrada-AnguloFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacan 80260, Mexico.
Octavio Zapata-RamírezFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacan 80260, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-6049-6031
Beatriz I Castro-PérezFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacan 80260, Mexico.
Jesús D Urías-EstradaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacan 80260, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6600-8417
Soila Gaxiola-CamachoFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacan 80260, Mexico.
Claudio Angulo-MontoyaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacan 80260, Mexico.
Francisco G Ríos-RincónFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacan 80260, Mexico.
Alberto BarrerasVeterinary Science Research Institute, Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexicali 21100, Mexico.
Richard A ZinnAnimal Science Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
José B Leyva-MoralesHealth Sciences Department, University Autonomous of the West, Guasave 81048, Mexico.
Xiomara Perea-DomínguezHealth Sciences Department, University Autonomous of the West, Guasave 81048, Mexico.
Alejandro PlascenciaNatural and Exact Sciences Department, University Autonomous of the West, Guasave 81048, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2151-5372
Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Baja California · MXUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this trial was to test the effects of the use of eubiotics (pro- and prebiotics) alone or in combination in the diet of lambs finished under subtropical climate conditions. For this purpose, 40 Pelibuey × Katahdin lambs (29.5 ± 4.8 kg initial live weight) were used in a 93 day growth-performance experiment. Dietary treatments consisted of a cracked corn-based finishing diet supplemented with (1) no eubiotics (control), (2) 3 g of probiotics (live

Indexed as

carcassfinishing lambsperformanceprebioticsprobioticsvisceral mass

Identifiers

PMID34827130
PMCPMC8615104
OpenAlexW3213638440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.