Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34827126›Full record

ArticleBiology2021

Semantic Segmentation of Urinary Bladder Cancer Masses from CT Images: A Transfer Learning Approach.

Sandi Baressi Šegota, Ivan Lorencin, Klara Smolić, Nikola Anđelić, Dean Markić, Vedran Mrzljak, Daniel Štifanić, Jelena Musulin, Josip Španjol, Zlatan Car

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandi Baressi ŠegotaFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-3015-1024
Ivan LorencinFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-5964-245X
Klara SmolićClinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Krešimirova 42, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-9704-4314
Nikola AnđelićFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-0314-243X
Dean MarkićClinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Krešimirova 42, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-5696-0850
Vedran MrzljakFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-0323-2600
Daniel ŠtifanićFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-9396-2441
Jelena MusulinFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-5213-1550
Josip ŠpanjolClinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Krešimirova 42, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-5551-8128
Zlatan CarFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-2817-9252
University of Rijeka · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary bladder cancer is one of the most common cancers of the urinary tract. This cancer is characterized by its high metastatic potential and recurrence rate. Due to the high metastatic potential and recurrence rate, correct and timely diagnosis is crucial for successful treatment and care. With the aim of increasing diagnosis accuracy, artificial intelligence algorithms are introduced to clinical decision making and diagnostics. One of the standard procedures for bladder cancer diagnosis is computer tomography (CT) scanning. In this research, a transfer learning approach to the semantic segmentation of urinary bladder cancer masses from CT images is presented. The initial data set is divided into three sub-sets according to image planes: frontal (4413 images), axial (4993 images), and sagittal (996 images). First, AlexNet is utilized for the design of a plane recognition system, and it achieved high classification and generalization performances with an AUCmicro¯ of 0.9999 and σ(AUCmicro) of 0.0006. Furthermore, by applying the transfer learning approach, significant improvements in both semantic segmentation and generalization performances were achieved. For the case of the frontal plane, the highest performances were achieved if pre-trained ResNet101 architecture was used as a backbone for U-net with DSC¯ up to 0.9587 and σ(DSC) of 0.0059. When U-net was used for the semantic segmentation of urinary bladder cancer masses from images in the axial plane, the best results were achieved if pre-trained ResNet50 was used as a backbone, with a DSC¯ up to 0.9372 and σ(DSC) of 0.0147. Finally, in the case of images in the sagittal plane, the highest results were achieved with VGG-16 as a backbone. In this case, DSC¯ values up to 0.9660 with a σ(DSC) of 0.0486 were achieved. From the listed results, the proposed semantic segmentation system worked with high performance both from the semantic segmentation and generalization standpoints. The presented results indicate that there is the possibility for the utilization of the semantic segmentation system in clinical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputer tomographymachine learningsemantic segmentationurinary bladder cancer

Identifiers

PMID34827126
PMCPMC8614660
OpenAlexW3212385994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.