Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34826972›Full record

Observational studyIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Outdoor activity and myopia progression in children: A follow-up study using mixed-effects model.

Saroj Gupta, Ankur Joshi, Harsha Saxena, Anirban Chatterjee

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bi-Gaussian analysis reveals distinct education-related alterations in spherical equivalent and axial length-results from the Gutenberg Health Study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saroj GuptaDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ankur JoshiDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Harsha SaxenaDepartment of Ophthalmology, M M Joshi Eye Institute, Hubli, Karnataka, India.
Anirban ChatterjeeDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the influence of outdoor activity on myopia progression.

methodsIt was a hospital-based longitudinal prospective observational study. Children between 7 and 14 years of age with a myopia of - 0.5 D or worse were included. Myopia progression was evaluated by cycloplegic refraction, every 6 months for 18 months. Parents were asked to record the daily outdoor activity of the child in hours per day at school and at home during weekdays and at weekends separately, based on which the daily outdoor activity score was calculated. The independent variables measured included age and gender of the participant, degree of myopia, and the daily outdoor activity score. Progression of myopia was defined as an increase in the spherical equivalent (SE) over 18 months. The magnitude of the association was determined by two mixed-effects models.

resultsA total of 495 participants (250 males and 245 females) completed three visits during the study period. On taking age groups and paired observations as a random effect and adding SE at the last visit as the random slope in Model 1, each unit increase in outdoor activity had a negative effect on change in SE of - 0.01 (-0.02 to 0.00; P = 0.045). The same inverse relationship between outdoor activity and absolute SE as - 0.06 (-0.07 to - 0.03; P < 0.001) is estimated in Model 2.

conclusionThe study demonstrates a statistically significant inverse relationship between outdoor activity and myopia.

Indexed as

MyopiaChildDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProspective StudiesRefraction, OcularSurveys and QuestionnairesVision TestsMyopiaoutdoor activityprogressionrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID34826972
PMCPMC8837331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.