Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34826791›Full record

ArticleJournal of adolescence2021

Examining a new prosocial risk-taking scale in a longitudinal sample of ethnically diverse adolescents.

Emma Armstrong-Carter, Kathy T Do, João F Guassi Moreira, Mitchell J Prinstein, Eva H Telzer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of adolescence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Opposing Roles of Testosterone and Cortisol in Prosocial Risk-Taking.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adolescents Are More Likely to Help Others on Days They Take Risks and Crave Social Connections.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emma Armstrong-CarterGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, USA. Electronic address: emmaac@stanford.edu.
Kathy T DoDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
João F Guassi MoreiraThe University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Mitchell J PrinsteinDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Eva H TelzerDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Human Development: Interdisiplinary Research TrainingT32HD007376 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BELGER, AYSENIL, PROPPER, CATHI BARBRA · 1988 to 2020
$8.0M
Incorporating the Social Context into Neurocognitive Models of Adolescent Risk TakingR01DA039923 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TELZER, EVA HAIMO · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007376NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis longitudinal study designed and tested the validity of a new measure of prosocial risk taking - risks that individuals take in order to help others.

methodsThe sample was racially and ethnically diverse adolescents in the rural Southeastern United States (N = 867; Mage = 12.82 years, 10-14 years at Wave 1; 50% Girls, 33% White non-Latinx, 27% Latinx, 20% Black, 20% Mixed/Other race/ethnicity). Adolescents completed self-report measures of the new prosocial risk-taking scale at baseline and one- and two-year follow-ups.

resultsConfirmatory factor analysis demonstrated excellent model fit with a 6-item single factor score. Further, the scale demonstrated good test-retest reliability at one and two-year follow ups. The scale also demonstrated convergent validity, such that prosocial risk taking was positively correlated with prosocial tendencies, empathy, and sensation seeking, and negatively correlated with negative risk-taking behavior and risk tolerance. Finally, we found significant differences by race/ethnicity (but not by gender) in prosocial risk taking, which were not attributable to measurement invariance, and should be interpreted in the context of ongoing societal inequalities between youth.

conclusionsThe new Prosocial Risk-Taking Scale yielded reliable scores in our sample. It may be used in future research to investigate individual differences in adolescents' prosocial risk taking, developmental change in prosocial risk taking, and the significance of prosocial risk taking for adolescents' emotional and social adaptation.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingAdolescentHumansLongitudinal StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSoutheastern United StatesAdolescenceMeasure validationProsocial risk taking

Identifiers

PMID34826791
PMCPMC8688273
OpenAlexW3217623220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.