Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34826590›Full record

ArticleComplementary therapies in medicine2022

Consultations with health care providers and use of self-management strategies for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 related symptoms. A population based cross-sectional study in Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands.

Agnete E Kristoffersen, Esther T van der Werf, Trine Stub, Frauke Musial, Barbara Wider, Miek C Jong, Kathrin Wode, Jenny-Ann B Danell, Martine Busch, H J Rogier Hoenders and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Complementary therapies in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Collaborative Reverse Logistics Network for Infectious Medical Waste Management during the COVID-19 Outbreak.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Agnete E KristoffersenNational Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. Electronic address: agnete.kristoffersen@uit.no.
Esther T van der WerfLouis Bolk Institute, Bunnik, the Netherlands; The Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health (CIZG), the Netherlands.
Trine StubNational Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Frauke MusialNational Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Barbara WiderNational Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Miek C JongNational Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Kathrin WodeRegional Cancer Center Stockholm Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden; Department Radiation Sciences Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jenny-Ann B DanellDepartment of Sociology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Martine BuschThe Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health (CIZG), the Netherlands; Van Praag Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
H J Rogier HoendersThe Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health (CIZG), the Netherlands; Center for Integrative Psychiatry, Lentis, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Johanna H NordbergRegional Cancer Center Stockholm Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences & Society, Divison of Nursing & Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden.
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUmeå University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SELentis · NLLouis Bolk Instituut · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe present study was initiated to determine consultations with health care providers and use of self-management strategies for prevention or treatment of COVID-19 related symptoms in countries with a full lockdown (Norway), a partial lockdown (the Netherlands) and no lockdown (Sweden) during the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and if such use correlates with worries of being infected by COVID-19 disease.

designData were collected in collaboration with Ipsos A/S in April-June 2020. An adapted version of the International Questionnaire to measure use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (I-CAM-Q) was used with the categories "for prevention of COVID-19" and "to treat COVID-19-related symptoms" added. Data were collected among a representative sample in Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands using data assisted telephone interviews (Norway, n=990 and Sweden, n=500), and an online survey (the Netherlands, n=1004). Total response rate was 30%.

resultsVery few consulted a health care provider with the intention to treat or prevent COVID-19 (1.2% and 1.0% respectively) with medical doctors mostly visited (1.0% and 0.9% respectively). Similarly, the use of self-management strategies to prevent or treat COVID-19 was low (3.4% and 0.2% respectively); most commonly used for prevention of COVID-19 were vitamins and minerals (2.8%). Consultations with health care providers and use of self-management strategies for prevention of COVID-19 were positively associated with worries of being infected with COVID-19.

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic does not seem to have evoked a large-scale difference in behavior related to consultations with health care providers or the use of self-management strategies in any of the three countries.

Indexed as

COVID-19Self-ManagementCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansNetherlandsPandemicsReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2SwedenComplementary therapiesCOVID-19Health careSARS-CoV-2Self-help techniques

Identifiers

PMID34826590
PMCPMC8609665
OpenAlexW3128611088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.