Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34826381›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2022

Efficacy and safety of the CVnCoV SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine candidate in ten countries in Europe and Latin America (HERALD): a randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 trial.

Peter G Kremsner, Rodolfo Andrés Ahuad Guerrero, Eunate Arana-Arri, Gustavo Jose Aroca Martinez, Marc Bonten, Reynaldo Chandler, Gonzalo Corral, Eddie Jan Louis De Block, Lucie Ecker, Julian Justin Gabor and 27 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04652102 (COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 103 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04652102 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

COVID-19: A Phase 2b/3, Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Investigational SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine CVnCoV in Adults 18 Years of Age and Older

TypeinterventionalSponsorCureVacRan2020 to 2022Enrolled39,680ConditionsCovid19, SARS-CoV-2ArmsCVnCoV, Placebo, Authorized/licensed vaccines for preventing COVID-19 (AV) as standard of care through their national vaccination program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Assessing the robustness of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials: systematic review and meta-analysis, January 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Decoding pH-Driven Phase Transition of Lipid Nanoparticles.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Immunology of RNA-based vaccines: The critical interplay between inflammation and expression.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Research progress of mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases.European journal of medical research · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.

Peter G KremsnerInstitute of Tropical Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné, Lambaréné, Gabon; German Center for Infection Research, Tübingen, Germany. Electronic address: peter.kremsner@uni-tuebingen.de.
Rodolfo Andrés Ahuad GuerreroCorporacion Medica de General San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eunate Arana-ArriBiocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain; Scientific Coordination Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain.
Gustavo Jose Aroca MartinezPostgraduate School of Nephrology, Clínica de la Costa y Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Marc BontenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Reynaldo ChandlerCevaxin, Panama City, Panama.
Gonzalo CorralInstituto de Investigaciones Clinicas de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata, Argentina.
Eddie Jan Louis De BlockCohezio, Brussels, Belgium.
Lucie EckerInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Peru.
Julian Justin GaborInstitute of Tropical Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Carlos Alberto Garcia LopezUnidad de Medicina Especializada, San Juan del Río, Mexico.
Lucy GonzalesClinica Medica San Martin, Ica, Peru.
María Angélica Granados GonzálezCentro de Atención e Investigación Médica, Bogotá, Colombia.
Nestor GoriniHaematology and Haemotherapy Diagnosis and Treatment Unit, Hospital Zonal General de Agudos Descentralizado Evita Pueblo de Berazategui, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martin P GrobuschCentre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné, Lambaréné, Gabon; German Center for Infection Research, Tübingen, Germany; Center of Tropical Medicine and Travel Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Adrian D HrabarInstituto de Investigaciones Clínicas Quilmes, Hudson, Argentina.
Helga JunkerCureVac, Tübingen, Germany.
Alan KimuraCureVac, Tübingen, Germany.
Claudio F LanataInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Peru; School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Clara LehmannInfection Protection Centre (ISZ) & Infection Outpatient Clinic, Innere Medizin I, Uniklinik Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Isabel Leroux-RoelsCenter for Vaccinology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Philipp MannCureVac, Tübingen, Germany.
Michel Fernando Martinez-ReséndezSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.
Theresa J OchoaInstituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru; Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Carlos Alberto PoySanatorio Parque, Rosario, Argentina.
Maria Jose Reyes FentanesPanAmerican Clinical Research México, Juriquilla, Mexico.
Luis Maria Rivera MejiaFundacion Dominicana de Perinatologia, Hospital Universitario Maternidad Nuestra Senora de la Altagracia, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Vida Veronica Ruiz HerreraPanAmerican Clinical Research, Guadalajara, Mexico.
Xavier Sáez-LlorensClinical Research Department, Panama City, Panama; Cevaxin Research Center, Panama City, Panama; Senacyt, Panama City, Panama.
Oliver Schönborn-KellenbergerCogitars, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mirjam SchunkDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Alexandra Sierra GarciaCentro de estudios en Infectologia Pediatrica, Cali, Colombia.
Itziar VergaraPrimary Care Group, Biodonostia Institute for Health Research, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain; Research Network in Health Services in Chronic Diseases, Baracaldo, Spain.
Thomas VerstraetenP95 Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Services, Leuven, Belgium.
Marisa VicoInstituto de Investigaciones Clínicas Zárate, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Lidia OostvogelsCureVac, Tübingen, Germany.
HERALD Study Group
Universidad Panamericana · MXCureVac (Germany) · DETecnológico de Monterrey · MXCentre de Recherche Médicales de Lambaréné · GACentro Científico Tecnólogico - Rosario · ARNational University of General San Martín · ARUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEVanderbilt University · USAsociación Colombiana de Infectología · COBioCruces Health research Institute · ESBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESCentrum für Integrierte Onkologie · DEGhent University Hospital · BEHospital Zonal General De Agudos Descentralizado "Evita Pueblo" · ARInstituto de Investigaciones Físicas de Mar del Plata · ARInstituto de Investigación Nutricional · PEKU Leuven · BELMU Klinikum · DESecretaría Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación · PAUniversidad de Especialidades · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdditional safe and efficacious vaccines are needed to control the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to analyse the efficacy and safety of the CVnCoV SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine candidate.

methodsHERALD is a randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 clinical trial conducted in 47 centres in ten countries in Europe and Latin America. By use of an interactive web response system and stratification by country and age group (18-60 years and ≥61 years), adults with no history of virologically confirmed COVID-19 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intramuscularly either two 0·6 mL doses of CVnCoV containing 12 μg of mRNA or two 0·6 mL doses of 0·9% NaCl (placebo) on days 1 and 29. The primary efficacy endpoint was the occurrence of a first episode of virologically confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 of any severity and caused by any strain from 15 days after the second dose. For the primary endpoint, the trial was considered successful if the lower limit of the CI was greater than 30%. Key secondary endpoints were the occurrence of a first episode of virologically confirmed moderate-to-severe COVID-19, severe COVID-19, and COVID-19 of any severity by age group. Primary safety outcomes were solicited local and systemic adverse events within 7 days after each dose and unsolicited adverse events within 28 days after each dose in phase 2b participants, and serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest up to 1 year after the second dose in phase 2b and phase 3 participants. Here, we report data up to June 18, 2021. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04652102, and EudraCT, 2020-003998-22, and is ongoing.

findingsBetween Dec 11, 2020, and April 12, 2021, 39 680 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either CVnCoV (n=19 846) or placebo (n=19 834), of whom 19 783 received at least one dose of CVnCoV and 19 746 received at least one dose of placebo. After a mean observation period of 48·2 days (SE 0·2), 83 cases of COVID-19 occurred in the CVnCoV group (n=12 851) in 1735·29 person-years and 145 cases occurred in the placebo group (n=12 211) in 1569·87 person-years, resulting in an overall vaccine efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19 of 48·2% (95·826% CI 31·0-61·4; p=0·016). Vaccine efficacy against moderate-to-severe COVID-19 was 70·7% (95% CI 42·5-86·1; CVnCoV 12 cases in 1735·29 person-years, placebo 37 cases in 1569·87 person-years). In participants aged 18-60 years, vaccine efficacy against symptomatic disease was 52·5% (95% CI 36·2-64·8; CVnCoV 71 cases in 1591·47 person-years, placebo, 136 cases in 1449·23 person-years). Too few cases occurred in participants aged 61 years or older (CVnCoV 12, placebo nine) to allow meaningful assessment of vaccine efficacy. Solicited adverse events, which were mostly systemic, were more common in CVnCoV recipients (1933 [96·5%] of 2003) than in placebo recipients (1344 [67·9%] of 1978), with 542 (27·1%) CVnCoV recipients and 61 (3·1%) placebo recipients reporting grade 3 solicited adverse events. The most frequently reported local reaction after any dose in the CVnCoV group was injection-site pain (1678 [83·6%] of 2007), with 22 grade 3 reactions, and the most frequently reported systematic reactions were fatigue (1603 [80·0%] of 2003) and headache (1541 [76·9%] of 2003). 82 (0·4%) of 19 783 CVnCoV recipients reported 100 serious adverse events and 66 (0·3%) of 19 746 placebo recipients reported 76 serious adverse events. Eight serious adverse events in five CVnCoV recipients and two serious adverse events in two placebo recipients were considered vaccination-related. None of the fatal serious adverse events reported (eight in the CVnCoV group and six in the placebo group) were considered to be related to study vaccination. Adverse events of special interest were reported for 38 (0·2%) participants in the CVnCoV group and 31 (0·2%) participants in the placebo group. These events were considered to be related to the trial vaccine for 14 (<0·1%) participants in the CVnCoV group and for five (<0·1%) participants in the placebo group.

interpretationCVnCoV was efficacious in the prevention of COVID-19 of any severity and had an acceptable safety profile. Taking into account the changing environment, including the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants, and timelines for further development, the decision has been made to cease activities on the CVnCoV candidate and to focus efforts on the development of next-generation vaccine candidates.

fundingGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research and CureVac.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, SyntheticAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodEuropeFemaleHumansLatin AmericaMaleMiddle AgedVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID34826381
PMCPMC8610426
OpenAlexW3215521526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.