Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34826346›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution2022

Comparative morphological study of skeletal muscle weight among the red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and various fowl breeds (Gallus domesticus).

Hideki Endo, Naoki Tsunekawa, Kohei Kudo, Tatsuo Oshida, Masaharu Motokawa, Mitsuru Sonoe, Sawai Wanghongsa, Chanin Tirawattanawanich, Viengsavanh Phimphachanhvongsod, Takeshi Sasaki and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Hideki EndoThe University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4779-0399
Naoki TsunekawaDepartment of Bioscience in Daily Life, College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, Fujisawa, Japan.
Kohei KudoThe University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuo OshidaLaboratory of Wildlife Ecology, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0863-9530
Masaharu MotokawaThe Kyoto University Museum, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5359-0070
Mitsuru SonoeDepartment of International Development Studies, College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, Fujisawa, Japan.
Sawai WanghongsaNational Parks, Wildlife and Plants Conservation Department, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chanin TirawattanawanichDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Viengsavanh PhimphachanhvongsodResearch Management Division, National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Vientiane, Laos.
Takeshi SasakiFaculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Atsugi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4210-5022
Takahiro YonezawaFaculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Atsugi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0012-1887
Fumihito AkishinonomiyaThe University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Nihon University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPTokyo University of Agriculture · JPDepartment of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation · THKasetsart University · THKyoto University · JPMinistry of Agriculture and Forestry · LAObihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine · JPYamashina Institute for Ornithology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the weight distribution of skeletal muscles of the red jungle fowl, then compared these values with those of domesticated populations to determine how muscle distribution has changed by selecting breeding. Sonia, Fayoumi, and Rhode Island Red were selected for comparison from livestock breeds, while Japanese Shamo and Thai fighting cocks were selected from cockfighting groups. Principal component analysis was applied using body size-free data. The mass distribution of muscles clearly differed between the wild, livestock, and cockfighting groups, demonstrating that muscle distribution has changed after selecting breeding, coupled with functional demands of each group. The red jungle fowl, which has the ability to fly, could be clearly distinguished from the flightless domesticated populations due to differences in flight pectoral muscle size. The cervical muscles in the wild population were smaller than in the domesticated groups; these do not contribute to flight. The gluteal muscles were larger in the fighting cock group, functionally coupled to their traditionally preferred upright posture. Wild bird populations typically exhibit reduced weight of their hind limbs, associated with flight, but as the red jungle fowl displays largely terrestrial behavior, these muscles are similar in arrangement and relative size to those of the livestock groups. We showed that the mass distribution pattern of skeletal muscles expresses selecting breeding strategy and clearly reflects the specific traits for each group.

Indexed as

ChickensMuscle, SkeletalAnimalsBody SizePhenotypebreedingchickendomesticationfighting cockskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID34826346
PMCPMC9788176
OpenAlexW3215631426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.