ArticleScience advances2021
The contribution of low contrast-preferring neurons to information representation in the primary visual cortex after learning.
Article in Science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Visual Perception and Gamma Oscillations in Cat V1 are Dynamically Correlated in Contrast Sensitivity Functions.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animals exhibit improved perception of lower-contrast visual objects after training. We explored this neuronal mechanism using multiple single-unit recordings from deep layers of the primary visual cortex (V1) of trained rats during orientation discrimination. We found that the firing rates of a subset of neurons increased by reducing luminance contrast, being at least above basal activities at low contrast. These low contrast–preferring neurons were rare during passive viewing without training or anesthesia after training. They fired more frequently in correct-choice than incorrect-choice trials. At single-neuron and population levels, they efficiently represented low-contrast orientations. Following training, in addition to generally enhanced excitation, the phase synchronization of spikes to beta oscillations at high contrast was stronger in putative inhibitory than excitatory neurons. The change in excitation-inhibition balance might contribute to low-contrast preference. Thus, low-contrast preference in V1 activity is strengthened in an experience-dependent manner, which may contribute to low-contrast visual discrimination.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.