Trial reportClinical drug investigation2022
Safety and Efficacy of the FLECTOR (Diclofenac Epolamine) Topical System in Children with Minor Soft Tissue Injuries: A Phase IV Non-randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02132247 (An Open-label, Prospective, Uncontrolled Study of the Safety and Local Tolerability of the Diclofenac Epolamine Patch), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open-label, Prospective, Uncontrolled Study of the Safety and Local Tolerability of the Diclofenac Epolamine Patch (Flector Patch) in Pediatric Patients With Minor Soft Tissue Injuries
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Strategies for Managing Pediatric Fracture Pain: Assessment, Pharmacological, and Non-Pharmacological Interventions.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Review
- Multidisciplinary Guidelines for the Rational Use of Topical Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for Musculoskeletal Pain (2022).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Assessing knowledge, attitude and practice of community pharmacists on the pain management and implications in UAE children.Pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveA topical formulation of diclofenac (FLECTOR diclofenac epolamine topical system (FDETS)) is approved in adults for the treatment of acute pain due to minor strains, sprains, and contusions; however, its safety and efficacy have not been investigated in a pediatric population. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of the FLECTOR (diclofenac epolamine) topical system in children.
methodsThis was an open-label, single-arm, phase IV study at ten USA-based family medicine or pediatric practices in children aged 6-16 years with a clinically significant minor soft tissue injury sustained within the preceding 96 h and at least moderate spontaneous pain on the Wong-Baker FACES
results104 patients were enrolled; 52 were 6-11 years old, and 52 were 12-16 years old (mean age 11.6 years). The maximum tolerability score experienced by any patient was 1 (faint redness). Fourteen adverse events (none serious) in nine patients (8.7%) were considered possibly treatment-related. Reduction in pain during the study was somewhat greater for patients aged 6-11 versus 12-16 years (p < 0.011). The diclofenac plasma concentration tended to be higher in the younger age group compared with older patients: 1.83 versus 1.46 ng/mL at the first assessment and 2.49 versus 1.11 ng/mL at the last assessment (p = 0.002).
conclusionThe FLECTOR topical system safely and effectively provided pain relief for minor soft tissue injuries in the pediatric population, with minimal systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exposure and low potential risk of local or systemic adverse events. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02132247.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.