Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34826104›Full record

SynthesisDrugs2022

Rationale and Clinical Use of Bronchodilators in Adults with Bronchiectasis.

Miguel Ángel Martínez-García, Grace Oscullo, Alberto García-Ortega, Maria Gabriella Matera, Paola Rogliani, Mario Cazzola

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in Taiwan.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Miguel Ángel Martínez-GarcíaRespiratory Department, Polytechnic and University La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2194-1478
Grace OsculloRespiratory Department, Polytechnic and University La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2121-7554
Alberto García-OrtegaRespiratory Department, Polytechnic and University La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Maria Gabriella MateraUnit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Paola RoglianiUnit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7801-5040
Mario CazzolaUnit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy. mario.cazzola@uniroma2.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4895-9707
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there is much controversy surrounding the therapeutic approach to pulmonary function abnormalities in patients with bronchiectasis and, consequently, whether and when to use bronchodilators in these patients. National and international guidelines on the treatment of bronchiectasis in adults do not recommend the routine use of bronchodilators because there is no evidence that a significant response to a bronchodilator or the presence or hyperresponsiveness of the airway are good predictors of future effective clinical response. However, some guidelines recommend them in the presence of airway obstruction and/or special conditions, which vary according to the guideline in question, although there are no recommendations on optimal dosing and bronchodilator treatment combined with or without inhaled corticosteroids. Nonetheless, in contrast with guideline recommendations, bronchodilators are overused in real-world patients with bronchiectasis even in the absence of airway obstruction, as demonstrated by analysis of national and international registries. This overuse can be explained by the awareness of the existence of a solid pharmacological rationale that supports the use of bronchodilators in the presence of chronic airway obstruction independent of its aetiology. We performed a systematic review of the literature and were able to verify that there are no randomised controlled trials (apart from a small study with methodological limitations and a very recent trial involving a not-very-large number of patients), or any long-term observational studies on the short- or long-term effect of bronchodilators in patients with bronchiectasis. Therefore, we believe that it is essential and even urgent to evaluate the effects of bronchodilators in these patients with appropriately designed studies.

Indexed as

BronchiectasisBronchodilator AgentsComorbidityHumansLungPractice Guidelines as TopicPulmonary VentilationRespiratory Function TestsBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID34826104
OpenAlexW3217784789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.