Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34826035›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2022

Building a Community Based Mental Health Program for Adolescents in Botswana: Stakeholder Feedback.

Merrian J Brooks, Bathusi K Phetogo, Hannah Schwennesen, Onkemetse Phoi, Ontibile Tshume, Mogomotsi Matshaba, Elizabeth Lowenthal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05664490 (Youth Friendship Bench SA), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05664490 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Youth Friendship Bench SA: Optimization of the Friendship Bench Mental Health Intervention for Adolescent Girls and Young Women in South African PrEP Delivery Settings

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2023 to 2024Enrolled116ConditionsDepression, Pre-Exposure ProphylaxisArmsYouth Friendship Bench SA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Future Directions for Community-Engaged Research in Clinical Psychological Science with Youth.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Merrian J BrooksBotswana-UPenn Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana. brooksm2@email.chop.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2607-6524
Bathusi K PhetogoBotswana Ministry of Health and Wellness, Gaborone, Botswana.
Hannah SchwennesenUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Onkemetse PhoiBotswana-Baylor Children's Clinical Centre of Excellence, Gaborone, Botswana.
Ontibile TshumeBotswana-Baylor Children's Clinical Centre of Excellence, Gaborone, Botswana.
Mogomotsi MatshabaBotswana-Baylor Children's Clinical Centre of Excellence, Gaborone, Botswana.
Elizabeth LowenthalBotswana-UPenn Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana.
Botswana-Baylor Children's Clinical Center of Excellence · BWChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USMinistry of Health · BWUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Virus & Reservoirs CoreP30AI045008 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROBERT GROSS · 1999 to 2026
$78.6M
Penn Mental Health AIDS Research CenterP30MH097488 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Knashawn Hodge Morales · 2013 to 2026
$23.5M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI045008NICHD NIH HHS L40 HD093209NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH097488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen planning interventions for adolescents, adult interventions should not be used 'as is' in youth settings. Stakeholder engagement can help understand the overall adolescent mental health ecosystem and adapt existing evidence-based interventions for the youth.

objectiveTo understand the overall mental health needs of adolescents in Botswana and the necessary adaptations required for an adolescent lay counselor based intervention in the country.

methodsWe used the theory of change model and the nominal group technique in five stakeholder meetings. Meetings were held to discuss the mental health needs of youth in Botswana and identify priorities for a lay counsellor based intervention modelled after the Friendship Bench intervention, an existing mental health intervention for adults.

resultsThe root causes of mental health problems among Botswana's youth identified by stakeholders included limited mental health knowledge among the youth and the community, family problems, poor communication, low self-esteem, the rapid growth of technology, and biological/genetic predisposition. Structurally barriers included: mental illness-related stigma, lack of psychosocial support, incomplete follow up for health services, cultural beliefs about mental illness, and fragmented mental health services. The stakeholders envisage a program that could empower adolescents and youth counselors to address mental health concerns for a healthier community. The group identified and prioritized several key elements of an effective lay counselor intervention.

conclusionsA diverse group of community stakeholders can illustrate critical mental health needs and elements that countries could use to adapt and contextualize a lay counsellor based mental health intervention for new populations such as the youth.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthAdolescentAdultBotswanaEcosystemFeedbackHumansAdolescentsCommunity-based participatory researchCommunity health planningMental health

Identifiers

PMID34826035
PMCPMC9172915
OpenAlexW3215561713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.