ArticleClinical oral investigations2022
Long-term three-dimensional effects of orthognathic surgery on the pharyngeal airways: a prospective study in 128 healthy patients.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- What is the influence of occlusal plane rotation in orthognathic surgery on upper airway volume?Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Observational
- Is Maxillomandibular Advancement Possible in Skeletal Class III Patients? A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Alterations in upper airway dimensions following bimaxillary and mandibular setback surgery in skeletal Class III patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate volumetric and circumferential pharyngeal airway space (PAS) changes and stability over time as evaluated with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) before and after orthognathic surgery 2 years postoperatively. MATERIALS AND
methodsOne hundred twenty-eight patients underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery at the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery of University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium, were recruited prospectively. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the amount of mandibular advancement in 5 mm increments (< 0 mm, 0-5 mm, 5-10 mm, or > 10 mm). CBCT data was acquired preoperatively and 1-6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Patients with a history of maxillofacial trauma or surgery, obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, or craniofacial anomalies were excluded. Nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal PAS volumes and constriction surface areas (mCSA) were measured and compared between each time point with a paired t-test.
resultsThe largest significant increase in oropharyngeal volume and mCSA were observed in the 5-10 mm (+ 13.3-21.7%, + 51.3-83.0%)) and > 10 mm (+ 23.3-44.6%, + 92.3-130.0%) mandibular advancement groups. This increase only remained stable 2 years postoperatively in the > 10 mm group. In other mandibular advancement groups, short-term oropharyngeal volume and mCSA increases were noticed, which returned to baseline levels 6 months to 1 year postoperatively.
conclusionBimaxillary advancement osteotomy significantly increases oropharyngeal volume and mCSA, which remains stable between 6 months to 1 year postoperatively. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Long-term stable volumetric and mCSA enlargements were found with > 10 mm mandibular advancements over a period of 2 years. Return towards baseline levels was observed in the other mandibular advancement groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34826028What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.