Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34826017›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2022

Current trends in anesthetic depth and antinociception monitoring: an international survey.

Sean Coeckelenbergh, Philippe Richebé, Dan Longrois, Alexandre Joosten, Stefan De Hert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current Trends in Anaesthesia Monitoring: A Survey Study.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Brain health: A concern for anaesthesiologists and intensivists.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Closing the loop: automation in anesthesiology is coming.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sean CoeckelenberghDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. sean.coeckelenbergh@ulb.be.ORCID 0000-0002-3478-0696
Philippe RichebéDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, CIUSSS de L'Est de L'Ile de Montréal (CEMTL), University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Dan LongroisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, AP-HP. Nord-Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Alexandre JoostenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Stefan De HertDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEGhent University Hospital · BEHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CAUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current trends in anesthetic depth (i.e., hypnosis) and antinociception monitoring are unclear. We thus aimed to determine contemporary perspectives on monitoring these components of anesthesia during general anesthesia. Participants received and responded anonymously to an internet-based international survey supported by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Comparisons, when applicable, were carried out using Chi

Indexed as

AnestheticsMonitoring, IntraoperativeAnalgesicsAnesthesia, GeneralElectroencephalographyHumansHypnotics and SedativesSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesicsAnestheticsHypnotics and SedativesBurst suppressionGeneral anesthesiaGoal-directed therapyIntraoperative monitoringPain

Identifiers

PMID34826017
OpenAlexW3216399934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.