Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34825956›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2022

Binocular visual function after unilateral versus bilateral implantation of segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: a pilot study.

Yiyun Liu, Qianqian Lan, Tong Sun, Chuhao Tang, Tingting Yang, Hongyu Duan, Rongjun Liu, Hong Qi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of visual quality after Q value-guided FS-LASIK and SMILE for correction of myopia with age-related accommodation deficiency.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yiyun LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, 49 North Garden Road, BeijingBeijing, 100191, China.
Qianqian LanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, 49 North Garden Road, BeijingBeijing, 100191, China.
Tong SunDepartment of Ophthalmology, Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, 49 North Garden Road, BeijingBeijing, 100191, China.
Chuhao TangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, 49 North Garden Road, BeijingBeijing, 100191, China.
Tingting YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, 49 North Garden Road, BeijingBeijing, 100191, China.
Hongyu DuanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, 49 North Garden Road, BeijingBeijing, 100191, China.
Rongjun LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, 49 North Garden Road, BeijingBeijing, 100191, China.
Hong QiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, 49 North Garden Road, BeijingBeijing, 100191, China. doctorqihong@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3066-8020
Peking University · CN

Funding

national natural science foundation of china 81570813national natural science foundation of china 81974128the capital health research and development of special 2020-2-4097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate binocular visual function after unilateral and bilateral implantation of segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs).

methodsThis prospective comparative pilot study included patients who underwent SBL-3 (Lenstec; + 3.00 D) implantation at Peking University Third Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups (monocular or binocular surgery). Thirty-two patients with emmetropic presbyopic contralateral eyes and 49 patients with bilateral SBL-3 implantation within a week between eyes were included in the unilateral SBL-3 and bilateral groups, respectively. At 3-month follow-up, the main outcomes were binocular uncorrected distant, intermediate, and near visual acuity (UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA). Secondary outcomes included binocular best-corrected visual acuity at all distances, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, photic phenomena, spectacle independence, patient satisfaction, and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) score. The essential perceptual phenomena constituting binocular vision, simultaneous perception, fusion, and stereopsis were also evaluated.

resultsBoth groups showed similar binocular UDVA and UIVA, but UNVA was significantly better in the bilateral group (0.07 ± 0.07 versus 0.12 ± 0.07, P = 0.008). Better binocular defocus curve at intermediate to near focal points, higher percentage of spectacle independence at near distance, and NEI-VFQ-25 near activity scores were observed in the bilateral group. No significant differences in contrast sensitivity, photic phenomena, overall satisfaction, other NEI-VFQ-25 subscales, fusional amplitude, and stereoacuity were found between groups.

conclusionUnilateral implantation of segmented refractive MIOL provided desirable distant visual acuity and high patient satisfaction, but inferior intermediate and near visual outcomes compared with bilateral implantation.

Indexed as

Lenses, IntraocularMultifocal Intraocular LensesPhacoemulsificationHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignPseudophakiaVision, BinocularBinocular visual functionMultifocal intraocular lensRefractive intraocular lensStereoacuity

Identifiers

PMID34825956
OpenAlexW3215812331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.