Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34825652›Full record

ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2022

Clinical outcomes of suboptimal stent deployment as assessed by optical coherence tomography: long-term results of the CLI-OPCI registry.

Francesco Prati, Enrico Romagnoli, Flavio Giuseppe Biccirè, Francesco Burzotta, Alessio La Manna, Simone Budassi, Vito Ramazzotti, Mario Albertucci, Franco Fabbiocchi, Alessandro Sticchi and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07182799 (Definition of Intra-procedural Optical Coherence Tomography), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07182799 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Definition of Intra-procedural Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Clinical Impact, Both in Terms of Revascularization Indication and Procedural Result.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2025 to 2036Enrolled3,200ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), Chronic Coronary Syndrome, MINOCA, INOCA (Ischemia With Non Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease)ArmsPlaque vulnerability assessment, Stent implantation optimization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Intravascular Imaging for Facilitated Coronary Interventions in DES Era.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  4. Impact of lesion preparation and stent optimisation on lesion-oriented events in PCI with drug-eluting stents: 5-year results from the AIDA trial.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Work in progress: OCT-guided coronary interventions in the acute setting.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Image-guided percutaneous revascularization of the coronary arteries.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024
    Review
  9. Intracoronary imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: from evidence to guidelines.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Optical coherence tomography criteria for stent optimisation.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Optimising PCI by Intracoronary Image-guidance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesco PratiCardiovascular Sciences Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Enrico RomagnoliCentro per la Lotta Contro L'Infarto - CLI Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Flavio Giuseppe BiccirèCardiovascular Sciences Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Francesco BurzottaDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alessio La MannaCardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Simone BudassiCardiovascular Sciences Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Vito RamazzottiCardiovascular Sciences Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Mario AlbertucciCardiovascular Sciences Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Franco FabbiocchiCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro SticchiUniCamillus - Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Carlo TraniDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe CalligarisCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Massimo FineschiAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Francesco VersaciCardiology Department, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy.
Corrado TamburinoCardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Yukio OzakiDepartment of Cardiology, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan.
Fernando AlfonsoDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma Madrid, CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain.
Gary S MintzCardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele · ITCentro Cardiologico Monzino · ITSaint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese · ITCardiovascular Research Foundation · USFujita Health University Hospital · JPOspedale Santa Maria Goretti · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraprocedural optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a valuable tool for guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention, but long-term follow-up data are lacking.

aimsThe aim of this study was to address the long-term (7.5 years) clinical impact of quantitative OCT metrics of suboptimal stent implantation.

methodsThis retrospective study includes 391 patients with long-term follow-up (mean 2,737 days; interquartile range 1,301-3,143 days) from the multicentre Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto - Optimisation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) registry. OCT-assessed suboptimal stent deployment required the presence of at least one of the following pre-defined OCT findings: in-stent MLA <4.5 mm

resultsOne hundred and two patients (26.1%) with 138 stented lesions (27.7%) experienced a device-oriented cardiovascular event (DOCE). In-stent MLA <4.5 mm

conclusionsThe presence of OCT-assessed suboptimal criteria for stent implantation was related to a worse clinical outcome at very long-term follow-up. This information further supports an OCT-guided strategy of stent deployment.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsHumansRegistriesRetrospective StudiesStentsTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34825652
PMCPMC9904373
OpenAlexW3217801125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.