ArticleScience progress2021
Preventive effect and possible mechanisms of ultrashort wave diathermy on myogenic contracture in a rabbit model.
Article in Science progress, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrashort wave therapy promotes traumatic brain injury recovery by suppressing neuroinflammation.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Formation process of extension knee joint contracture following external immobilization in rats.World journal of orthopedics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the preventive effect of ultrashort wave diathermy on immobilization-induced myogenic contracture and to explore its underlying mechanisms. Forty-two rabbits were randomly assigned into control (Group C), immobilization (Group I, which was further divided into one week, Group I-1; two weeks, Group I-2; and four weeks, Group I-4, subgroups by the length of immobilization) and ultrashort wave prevention (Group U, which was further divided into one week, Group U-1; two weeks, Group U-2; and four weeks, Group U-4, by time of treatment) groups. Intervention effects were assessed by evaluating rectus femoris cross-sectional area (CSA), knee range of motion, and the protein levels for myogenic differentiation (MyoD) and muscle atrophy F-box (MAFbx-1) in the rectus femoris. Compared with those of Group C, in Groups I and U, total contracture, myogenic contracture, MyoD and MAFbx-1 levels were significantly elevated, and CSA was significantly smaller (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.