Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34825327›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Weather forecasting based on data-driven and physics-informed reservoir computing models.

Yslam D Mammedov, Ezutah Udoncy Olugu, Guleid A Farah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yslam D MammedovDepartment of Industrial and Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Technology and Built Environment, UCSI University, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 1001955426@ucsiuniversity.edu.my.
Ezutah Udoncy OluguDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Technology and Built Environment, UCSI University, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. olugu@ucsiuniversity.edu.my.
Guleid A FarahDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.

Funding

UCSI University Pioneer Scientist Incentive Fund (PSIF) Proj-In-FETBE-062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the growing demand for the global energy supply chain, wind power has become an important research subject among studies in the advancement of renewable energy sources. The major concern is the stochastic volatility of weather conditions that hinder the development of wind power forecasting approaches. To address this issue, the current study proposes a weather prediction method divided into two models for wind speed and atmospheric system forecasting. First, the data-based model incorporated with wavelet transform and recurrent neural networks is employed to predict the wind speed. Second, the physics-informed echo state network was used to learn the chaotic behavior of the atmospheric system. The findings were validated with a case study conducted on wind speed data from Turkmenistan. The results suggest the outperformance of physics-informed model for accurate and reliable forecasting analysis, which indicates the potential for implementation in wind energy analysis.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerWindForecastingPhysicsWeatherAtmospheric disturbanceEcho state networksLorenz systemPhysics informed machine learningRecurrent neural networksReservoir computingWind speed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.