ArticleSkeletal radiology2022
Diagnostic performance of conventional magnetic resonance imaging for detection and grading of subscapularis tendon tear according to Yoo and Rhee classification system in patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subscapularis Partial Thickness Tears by Yoo and Rhee Classification: Identifying MRI Predictors for Type IIB, Requiring Surgical Repair.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quantitative MR Imaging Marker: Effective Cross-Sectional Area of the Rotator Cuff and Its Correlation with the Biodex Isokinetic Test.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- Comparing 3D MERGE MRI and 2D MRI for Rotator Cuff Tear Evaluation and Surgical Planning; A Cross-Sectional Prospective Study.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Article
- Quantitative assessment of rotator cuff injuries using synthetic MRI and IDEAL-IQ imaging techniques.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging (CS-MRI) diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI for detecting and grading subscapularis (SSC) tears by applying the Yoo and Rhee classification. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 179 patients who underwent MRI followed by arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery were enrolled. Two musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated the SSC using axial, oblique sagittal, and oblique coronal MRI according to the Yoo and Rhee classification. Using arthroscopic findings as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver agreement of SSC tears were analyzed.
resultsArthroscopy confirmed that the numbers of type I, IIA, IIB, III, IV, and V tears were 35, 70, 35, 9, 9, and 0, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of readers 1 and 2 for the detection of tears (type IIA or higher) were 85%, 75%, and 82%, and 89%, 70%, and 83%, respectively, while those for the detection of surgical candidates (type IIB or higher) were 77%, 75%, and 75%, and 77%, 83%, and 82%, respectively. The interobserver agreement for detecting SSC tear presence was substantial (κ = 0.70) for reader 1 vs. reader 2, and those for detecting the surgical candidate group was substantial (κ = 0.68) for reader 1 vs. reader 2. The interobserver agreement for grading SSC tears was excellent (κ = 0.86) for reader 1 vs. reader 2.
conclusionConventional MRI showed 82.5% and 78.5% average accuracy in detecting IIA and IIB or higher tears by applying the Yoo and Rhee classification for the diagnosis of SSC tears with an excellent interobserver agreement in tear grading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.