Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34825241›Full record

ArticleEJVES vascular forum2021

Aorta, the Innocent Bystander of Bariatric Banding.

Dominic Pang, Peter Lamb, Orwa Falah

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 78% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dominic PangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Peter LambDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Orwa FalahDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaparoscopic gastric banding (LAGB) is a common bariatric operation performed for obesity. Complications of LAGB commonly evolve around device malfunction and physiological changes secondary to the gastric banding. Complications of LAGB involving the aorta are rare. A case of gastric band misplacement around the aorta and subsequent successful retrieval of the misplaced device is reported. REPORT: A 45 year old obese woman presented as an emergency with food bolus obstruction secondary to gastric banding inserted 10 years previously. Investigations revealed that her gastric band was misplaced around both the oesophagus at the level of the gastro-oesophageal junction and the descending thoracic aorta at the level of T12. Successful and safe retrieval of the misplaced device is reported electively via a two staged approach: first covering the segment of supra-coeliac aorta at the level of the gastric band with a thoracic aortic stent graft (TAG), and, second, assessing for any oesophageal injury via endoscopy and finally extracting the misplaced device via laparoscopy. A Gore C-TAG device size 26 mm × 100 mm was successfully implanted percutaneously via unilateral femoral access during her first stage procedure. Her gastric band was safely retrieved during her second stage procedure with no complications. She recovered well post-operatively. DISCUSSION: Complications of LAGB involving the aorta are rare but potentially life threatening. Multidisciplinary pre-operative planning is necessary for safe removal of the gastric band.

Indexed as

AortaGastic band complicationThoracic stent graft

Identifiers

PMID34825241
PMCPMC8603011
OpenAlexW3205684986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.