ArticleInternational journal of bioprinting2021
3D Bioprinting of Biomimetic Bilayered Scaffold Consisting of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix and Silk Fibroin for Osteochondral Repair.
Article in International journal of bioprinting, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Critical Systematic Review of 3D Bioprinting in Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Physical and Chemical Modifications of Polymeric Surfaces to Enhance Epithelial Cell Adhesion.ACS omega · 2025Article
- 3D bioprinted scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration: advancements and applications.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Incorporating Bone-Derived ECM into Macroporous Microribbon Scaffolds Accelerates Bone Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- 3D-printed constructs deliver bioactive cargos to expedite cartilage regeneration.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2024Review
- Integrating bioprinting, cell therapies and drug delivery towards in vivo regeneration of cartilage, bone and osteochondral tissue.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Review
- Advancements of 3D bioprinting in regenerative medicine: Exploring cell sources for organ fabrication.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Advances in 3D printing technology for preparing bone tissue engineering scaffolds from biodegradable materials.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- 3D printed osteochondral scaffolds: design strategies, present applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Decellularized extracellular matrix-based composite scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
- Recent development in multizonal scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Is 3D Printing Promising for Osteochondral Tissue Regeneration?ACS applied bio materials · 2023Review
- Recent Developments of Silk-Based Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Applications: A Special Focus on the Advancement of 3D Printing.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Mammalian-specific decellularized matrices derived bioink for bioengineering of liver tissue analogues: A review.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Experimental study on repair of cartilage defects in the rabbits with GelMA-MSCs scaffold prepared by three-dimensional bioprinting.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for Tendon Regeneration in Three-Dimensional Bioprinting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Silk Fibroin-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A Study on Dual-Response Composite Hydrogels Based on Oriented Nanocellulose.International journal of bioprinting · 2022Article
- Bioactive Inks Development for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering: A Mini-Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Biofabrication of the osteochondral unit and its applications: Current and future directions for 3D bioprinting.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology is becoming an appealing approach for osteochondral repair. However, it is challenging to develop a bilayered scaffold with anisotropic structural properties to mimic a native osteochondral tissue. Herein, we developed a bioink consisting of decellularized extracellular matrix and silk fibroin to print the bilayered scaffold. The bilayered scaffold mimics the natural osteochondral tissue by controlling the composition, mechanical properties, and growth factor release in each layer of the scaffold. The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.