ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2021
Taking the 4D Nature of fMRI Data Into Account Promises Significant Gains in Data Completion.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a powerful, noninvasive tool that has significantly contributed to the understanding of the human brain. FMRI data provide a sequence of whole-brain volumes over time and hence are inherently four dimensional (4D). Missing data in fMRI experiments arise from image acquisition limits, susceptibility and motion artifacts or during confounding noise removal. Hence, significant brain regions may be excluded from the data, which can seriously undermine the quality of subsequent analyses due to the significant number of missing voxels. We take advantage of the four dimensional (4D) nature of fMRI data through a tensor representation and introduce an effective algorithm to estimate missing samples in fMRI data. The proposed Riemannian nonlinear spectral conjugate gradient (RSCG) optimization method uses tensor train (TT) decomposition, which enables compact representations and provides efficient linear algebra operations. Exploiting the Riemannian structure boosts algorithm performance significantly, as evidenced by the comparison of RSCG-TT with state-of-the-art stochastic gradient methods, which are developed in the Euclidean space. We thus provide an effective method for estimating missing brain voxels and, more importantly, clearly show that taking the full 4D structure of fMRI data into account provides important gains when compared with three-dimensional (3D) and the most commonly used two-dimensional (2D) representations of fMRI data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.