Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34824900›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of neurodegenerative disease2021

Evaluation of the effectiveness of methylphenidate and modafinil in the treatment of daily drowsiness in patients with refractory epilepsy and their comparison with the control group.

Neda Sheikhina, Mohammad-Reza Najafi, Ahmad Chitsaz, Keyvan Ghadimi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of neurodegenerative disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neda SheikhinaDepartment of Neurology, Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan 8174673461, Iran.
Mohammad-Reza NajafiDepartment of Neurology, Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan 8174673461, Iran.
Ahmad ChitsazDepartment of Neurology, Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan 8174673461, Iran.
Keyvan GhadimiSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan 8174673461, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious articles show the high prevalence of sleep disorders and especially excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients with refractory epilepsy and the importance of personal and social burden of this complication on individuals. Considering the insufficient evidence to draw efficacy and safety of modafinil and methylphenidate to treat EDS in the patient with intractable seizures, we decided to compare the effect of methylphenidate and modafinil with the control group. It is hoped that this study will pave the way for further studies.

methodsThis study is a clinical trial (IRCT20171030037093N22) (URL: https://www.irct.ir/trial/42485). The study population was patients with refractory epilepsy referred to the neurology clinic of Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran, from 2019 to 2020. The patients were randomly divided into three groups. The first group was treated with methylphenidate, the second group was treated with modafinil, and the third group was not received any medication such as modafinil and methylphenidate. Methylphenidate dosage was 10-20 mg/day. The patients were treated with modafinil at a dose of 200-600 mg/day. EPWORTH sleepiness scale (ESS) and Total Sleep Time (TST) were calculated before and 8 weeks after the intervention for the patients.

results47 patients were included and divided into 3 groups, methylphenidate (10 males and 9 females), modafinil (7 males and 13 females), and control (4 males and 4 females). There was no significant difference among the groups based on ESS before and after intervention and TST after the intervention (P>0.05), but the mean of TST was significantly lower in the control group than in methylphenidate and modafinil groups before the intervention (P=0.003). The change of ESS and TST before compared to after intervention in the methylphenidate and modafinil group were significant (P<0.001), but the changes of ESS and TST in the control group were not significant (P>0.05). The frequency of complications (P=0.74) and outcomes (P=0.07) were similar in both groups.

conclusionModafinil and methylphenidate are two effective and safe drugs to increase the quality of sleep in the patients. Additionally, ESS and TST scores are better in the patients who used modafinil and methylphenidate.

Indexed as

excessive daytime sleepinessmethylphenidateModafinilquality of life

Identifiers

PMID34824900
PMCPMC8610805
OpenAlexW3216275444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.