ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental immunology2021
Assessment of fingolimod versus dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of multiple sclerosis; a 24-month follow-up study.
Article in American journal of clinical and experimental immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Adverse effects of immunotherapies for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The neuroprotective potential of Gerbera Jamesonii in a neuronal demyelination rat model through the modulation of interleukins, cyclooxygenase and tumor necrosis factor-α.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Article
- Role of Long Non-Coding RNA X-Inactive-Specific Transcript (Non-coding RNA · 2025Article
- An updated systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the efficacy and safety of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).BMJ neurology open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) using disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is a challenge worldwide. Fingolimod (FTY) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are two approved agents for oral treatment of MS with remarkable efficacy for relapse control and deceleration of disability progression. Therefore, the current study was done to compare disability control, lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and adverse effects between the patients treated with FTY and DMF.
methodsThis randomized clinical trial (IR.MUI.REC.1396.3.786) was conducted on 60 patients who were randomly divided into two groups of treatment with 0.5 mg daily dose of FTY (n = 30) and 240 mg dose of DMF twice daily (n = 30). Disability of patients was assessed using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) within 6 weeks, 12, and 24 months following treatment initiation and MRI was performed for all the patients prior to study initiation and within 24 months. Obtained data were compared between two study groups.
resultsThere was no significant difference between two treatment groups based on EDSS scores, brain lesions in MRI, and newly formed plaques (P>0.05). Skin and gastrointestinal-related complaints were the most common adverse effects of DMF while the increase in liver enzyme level and thrombocytopenia were the most common complications of FTY, respectively (
conclusionAccording to our findings, within 24-month follow-up, DMF was neither superior nor inferior to FTY comparing MRI lesions, EDSS scores, and adverse effects. Although, further evaluations with larger sample size are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34824898PMC8610802W3216865904What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.