Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34824881›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of blood research2021

Molecular and genomic landscapes in secondary & therapy related acute myeloid leukemia.

Harsh Goel, Ekta Rahul, Ishan Gupta, Anita Chopra, Amar Ranjan, Aditya Kumar Gupta, Jagdish Prasad Meena, Ganesh Kumar Viswanathan, Sameer Bakhshi, Aroonima Misra and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of blood research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. mHereditas · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Toxicities Associated with CAR-T Cell Therapies.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Short-chain fatty acids in cancer pathogenesis.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harsh GoelLaboratory Oncology Unit, Dr.B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi 110029, India.
Ekta RahulLaboratory Oncology Unit, Dr.B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi 110029, India.
Ishan GuptaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi 110029, India.
Anita ChopraLaboratory Oncology Unit, Dr.B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi 110029, India.
Amar RanjanLaboratory Oncology Unit, Dr.B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi 110029, India.
Aditya Kumar GuptaDivision of Pediatric Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi New Delhi 110029, India.
Jagdish Prasad MeenaDivision of Pediatric Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi New Delhi 110029, India.
Ganesh Kumar ViswanathanDepartment of Hematology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi New Delhi 110029, India.
Sameer BakhshiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr.B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi New Delhi 110029, India.
Aroonima MisraNational Institute of Pathology, ICMR New Delhi 110029, India.
Showket HussainDivision Of Molecular Oncology, National Institute of Cancer Prevention & Research I-7, Sector-39 Noida 201301, India.
Ritesh KumarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rudgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey NJ 07103, United States.
Archana SinghDepartment of Pathology, College of Medical Sciences, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences Jaipur 302033, India.
G K RathDepartment of Radiotherapy, Dr.B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi New Delhi 110029, India.
Ashok SharmaDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi New Delhi 110029, India.
Sandeep MittanDepartment of Cardiology, Ichan School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital 1468 Madison Avenue, New York 10028, United States.
Pranay TanwarLaboratory Oncology Unit, Dr.B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi 110029, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a complex, aggressive myeloid neoplasm characterized by frequent somatic mutations that influence different functional categories' genes, resulting in maturational arrest and clonal expansion. AML can arise de novo (dn-AML) or can be secondary AML (s-AML) refers to a leukemic process which may arise from an antecedent hematologic disorder (AHD-AML), mostly from a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) or can be the result of an antecedent cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy (therapy-related AML, t-AML). Clinical and biological features in secondary and therapy-related AML are distinct from de novo AML. Secondary and therapy-related AML occurs mainly in the elderly population and responds worse to therapy with higher relapse rates due to resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Over the last decade, advances in molecular genetics have disclosed the sub-clonal architecture of secondary and therapy-related AML. Recent investigations have revealed that cytogenetic abnormalities and underlying genetic aberrations (mutations) are likely to be significant factors dictating prognosis and critical impacts on treatment outcome. Secondary and therapy-related AML have a poorer outcome with adverse cytogenetic abnormalities and higher recurrences of unfavorable mutations compared to de novo AML. In this review, we present an overview of the clinical features of secondary and therapy-related AML and address the function of genetic mutations implicated in the pathogenesis of secondary leukemia. Detailed knowledge of the pathogenetic mechanisms gives an overview of new prognostic markers, including targetable mutations that will presumably lead to the designing and developing novel molecular targeted therapies for secondary and therapy-related AML. Despite significant advances in knowing the genetic aspect of secondary and therapy-related AML, its influence on the disease's pathophysiology, standard treatment prospects have not significantly evolved during the past three decades. Thus, we conclude this review by summarizing the modern and developing treatment strategies in secondary and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia.

Indexed as

leukemiaSecondary AMLtherapy related AML

Identifiers

PMID34824881
PMCPMC8610791
OpenAlexW3217716747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.