Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34824703›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2021

Cement selection criteria for full coverage restorations: A comprehensive review of literature.

Safoura Ghodsi, Sarah Arzani, Mina Shekarian, MohammadMostafa Aghamohseni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Functional Adhesives for a Restorative Future.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Safoura GhodsiDentist, Dental Research Center, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Islamic Azad University of medical sciences, Arghavanieh Blvd, Isfahan, Iran.
Sarah ArzaniDentistry Student, Department of Prosthodontics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Mina ShekarianDentistry Student, Department of Prosthodontics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
MohammadMostafa AghamohseniDentistry Student, Department of Prosthodontics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProper cement selection in fixed prosthesis plays a determinative role in providing long-term serviceability, retention, caries prevention, and patient satisfaction. This study, reviews different luting agent characteristics and their application based on different clinical situations and different types of full coverage restorations. MATERIAL AND

methodsAn electronic search was conducted through PubMed, Medline, and Google scholar using following keywords or combinations: restoration, full coverage, PFM, porcelain fused to metal, all ceramic, zirconia, ceramic, casting, fixed partial denture, cement*, dental cement, cement selection, and retention. The most related articles were selected for review.

resultsChoosing a proper luting agent is highly dependent on scientific knowledge regarding the characteristics of restorative materials and luting agents. Conventional cements could be indicated in various situations; however, some restorative materials or clinical situations call for resin-cements to provide predictable retention, support, and durability.

conclusionsConscious selection of retentive cement for each type of restoration/material is necessary to provide predictable successful treatment and reduce the potential complications.

Identifiers

PMID34824703
PMCPMC8601696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.