ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2021
Influence of energy drinks on enamel erosion:
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of two commercial energy drinks on enamel surface characteristics and orthodontic bracket shear bond strength: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Acid-Induced Surface Degradation of Metallic Biomaterials: Alloy-Dependent Behavior and Implications for Surface Functionality.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Beverage-Induced Surface Alterations on Dental Enamel: An In Vitro Biomaterial Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of the Surface Morphology of Dental Enamel Exposed to Ready-to-Drink Alcoholic Beverages.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Erosive Resistance of High-Translucency Resin Composites: New Insights for Esthetic Dentistry.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- Quantitative and spectroscopic assessment of early-stage enamel erosion induced by popular acidic beverages.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Comparative Chemical and Physical Characterization of Biomimetic Versus Commercial Hydroxyapatites for Tooth Enamel Repair.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effect of energy drinks on the surface microhardness of bulk fill resins. In vitro study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Erosive potential of energy drink modified by calcium formulations on dental enamel: An in vitro study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Effects of immersion in various beverages, polishing and bleaching systems on surface roughness and microhardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Effect of immune-boosting beverage, energy beverage, hydrogen peroxide superior, polishing methods and fine-grained dental prophylaxis paste on color of CAD-CAM restorative materials.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Analysis of the pH levels in energy and pre-workout beverages and frequency of consumption: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Different Methods of Scan Alignment in Erosive Tooth Wear Measurements: An In Vitro Study.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Energy drinks alter the surface morphology and roughness of composites, fissure sealants and titanium: AnHeliyon · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental erosion has become a relevant public health problem in recent years and is related to the increase in the consumption of acidic beverages. Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the erosive potential of energy drinks on dental enamel using an in vitro erosion model. MATERIAL AND
methodsThirty-eight blocks of human enamel were divided into four groups: G1- TNT Energy Drink®(n=8), G2- Red Bull® (n=10), G3- Monster Energy® (n=10), and G4- Coca-Cola® (n=10) (positive control). For the chemical analysis, the pH values, titratable acidity, and buffering capacity of the beverages were measured in triplicate. For the erosive test, the specimens were immersed in the beverages (5ml/block) for 30 minutes at room temperature with gentle shaking. Initial and final surface microhardness values were measured and the percentage of the loss of surface microhardness was calculated. Profilometry (surface loss and lesion depth) and mineral loss analysis (quantitative light-induced fluorescence) were performed. The data were analysed statistically using ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni correction, Pearson's correlation test, and multiple linear regression (
resultsThe energy drinks had pH values ranging from 2.36 to 3.41. The lowest titratable acidity value was recorded for Monster Energy® and the highest was recorded for TNT Energy Drink®. All energy drinks had buffering capacity values higher than Coca-Cola®. Analysing the eroded enamel surface, the specimens submitted to TNT Energy Drink® had the greatest percentage loss of surface microhardness, surface loss, depth, and mineral loss, followed by those submitted to Red Bull® and Monster Energy®. Surface loss was the only predictor of mineral loss (
conclusionsBased on the study model employed, all the energy drinks examined were erosive to tooth enamel and TNT Energy Drink® had the worst behaviour.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.