Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34824692›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2021

Influence of energy drinks on enamel erosion:

José-Gabriel-Victor-Costa Silva, João-Paulo-Gomes Martins, Elizabeth-Barreto-Galvão de Sousa, Nayanna-Lana-Soares Fernandes, Ingrid-Andrade Meira, Fábio-Correia Sampaio, Andressa-Feitosa-Bezerra de Oliveira, Ana-Maria-Barros-Chaves Pereira

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

José-Gabriel-Victor-Costa SilvaUndergraduate Dentistry Course, Health Sciences Centre, Federal University of Paraíba-UFPB, João Pessoa/Paraíba, Brazil.
João-Paulo-Gomes MartinsUndergraduate Dentistry Course, Health Sciences Centre, Federal University of Paraíba-UFPB, João Pessoa/Paraíba, Brazil.
Elizabeth-Barreto-Galvão de SousaUndergraduate Dentistry Course, Health Sciences Centre, Federal University of Paraíba-UFPB, João Pessoa/Paraíba, Brazil.
Nayanna-Lana-Soares FernandesDepartment of Clinical and Social Dentistry, Federal University of Paraíba-UFPB, João Pessoa/Paraíba, Brazil.
Ingrid-Andrade MeiraDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas- UNICAMP, Piracicaba/São Paulo, Brazil.
Fábio-Correia SampaioDepartment of Clinical and Social Dentistry, Federal University of Paraíba-UFPB, João Pessoa/Paraíba, Brazil.
Andressa-Feitosa-Bezerra de OliveiraDepartment of Morphology, Federal University of Paraíba-UFPB, João Pessoa/Paraíba, Brazil.
Ana-Maria-Barros-Chaves PereiraDepartment of Morphology, Federal University of Paraíba-UFPB, João Pessoa/Paraíba, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental erosion has become a relevant public health problem in recent years and is related to the increase in the consumption of acidic beverages. Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the erosive potential of energy drinks on dental enamel using an in vitro erosion model. MATERIAL AND

methodsThirty-eight blocks of human enamel were divided into four groups: G1- TNT Energy Drink®(n=8), G2- Red Bull® (n=10), G3- Monster Energy® (n=10), and G4- Coca-Cola® (n=10) (positive control). For the chemical analysis, the pH values, titratable acidity, and buffering capacity of the beverages were measured in triplicate. For the erosive test, the specimens were immersed in the beverages (5ml/block) for 30 minutes at room temperature with gentle shaking. Initial and final surface microhardness values were measured and the percentage of the loss of surface microhardness was calculated. Profilometry (surface loss and lesion depth) and mineral loss analysis (quantitative light-induced fluorescence) were performed. The data were analysed statistically using ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni correction, Pearson's correlation test, and multiple linear regression (

resultsThe energy drinks had pH values ranging from 2.36 to 3.41. The lowest titratable acidity value was recorded for Monster Energy® and the highest was recorded for TNT Energy Drink®. All energy drinks had buffering capacity values higher than Coca-Cola®. Analysing the eroded enamel surface, the specimens submitted to TNT Energy Drink® had the greatest percentage loss of surface microhardness, surface loss, depth, and mineral loss, followed by those submitted to Red Bull® and Monster Energy®. Surface loss was the only predictor of mineral loss (

conclusionsBased on the study model employed, all the energy drinks examined were erosive to tooth enamel and TNT Energy Drink® had the worst behaviour.

Identifiers

PMID34824692
PMCPMC8601704
OpenAlexW3211319094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.