Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34824579›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2021

Enterprise Risk Assessment Based on Machine Learning.

Boning Huang, Junkang Wei, Yuhong Tang, Chang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Recent research on machine learning in the diagnosis and treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Article
  4. Risk Analysis of Textile Industry Foreign Investment Based on Deep Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Intelligent Financial Auditing Model Based on Deep Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Boning HuangShenzhen University Webank Institute of Fintech, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518052, China.
Junkang WeiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Yuhong TangSchool of Business and Tourism, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Chang LiuDepartment of Qualitative Economics and Mathematics, School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1672-2887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific risk assessment is an important guarantee for the healthy development of an enterprise. With the continuous development and maturity of machine learning technology, it has played an important role in the field of data prediction and risk assessment. This paper conducts research on the application of machine learning technology in enterprise risk assessment. According to the existing literature, this paper uses three machine learning algorithms, i.e., random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and AdaBoost, to evaluate enterprise risk. In the specific implementation, the enterprise's risk assessment indexes are first established, which comprehensively describe the various risks faced by the enterprise through a number of parameters. Then, the three types of machine learning algorithms are trained based on historical data to build a risk assessment model. Finally, for a set of risk indicators obtained under current conditions, the risk index is output through the risk assessment model. In the experiment, some actual data are used to analyze and verify the method, and the results show that the proposed three types of machine learning algorithms can effectively evaluate enterprise risks.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSupport Vector MachineAlgorithmsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID34824579
PMCPMC8610684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.