Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34824494›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry

Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Pain-alleviating Methods before Local Anesthetic Administration in Children of 6 to 12 Years of Age: A Clinical Study.

Sudha B Patil, Divya D Popali, Prashant A Bondarde, Nikhil S Khandare, Akshay R Kothari, Pooja S Chawla, Sayali Gawale, Gaurav A Shinde, Rachana S Agrawal, Aditi S Patkar and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sudha B PatilDepartment of Pedodontics, JMF's ACPM Dental College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Divya D PopaliDepartment of Pedodontics, JMF's ACPM Dental College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Prashant A BondardeDepartment of Pedodontics, JMF's ACPM Dental College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Nikhil S KhandareDepartment of Pedodontics, JMF's ACPM Dental College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Akshay R KothariDepartment of Pedodontics, JMF's ACPM Dental College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Pooja S ChawlaDepartment of Pedodontics, JMF's ACPM Dental College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Sayali GawaleDepartment of Pedodontics, JMF's ACPM Dental College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Gaurav A ShindeDepartment of Pedodontics, JMF's ACPM Dental College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Rachana S AgrawalDepartment of Pedodontics, JMF's ACPM Dental College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Aditi S PatkarDepartment of Pedodontics, JMF's ACPM Dental College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Saurabh R MirgalDepartment of Pedodontics, JMF's ACPM Dental College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
ACPM Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and aim of the studyPediatric patients are apprehensive regarding having dental treatment mainly because of painful local anesthetic (LA) injections. Various techniques like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), topical anesthetic agents, and vibrator device are introduced to reduce discomfort before LA administration. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of TENS, 2% lignocaine gel, eutectic mixture of lignocaine and prilocaine (EMLA), and vibrating device before LA injections in alleviating pain in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty healthy children aged 6 to 12 years who required LA injections for dental procedures were selected and divided into four groups with 15 patients in each group. Wong-Baker's facial pain rating scale (WBFPRS) and face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability scale (FLACC) are used for pain perception which are tabulated, and statistically analyzed.

resultsThe test results demonstrated that the TENS group has shown the least mean WBFPRS and FLACC score, followed by vibrator devices, EMLA gel, and lignocaine gel.

conclusionThe newly introduced TENS apparatus showed encouraging results, hence can be used as a safe and reliable technique to be used in pediatric dentistry. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Patil SB, Popali DD, Bondarde PA,

Indexed as

2% LignocaineEutectic mixture of lignocaine and prilocainePain scalesTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulationVibrator

Identifiers

PMID34824494
PMCPMC8585909
OpenAlexW3208877382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.