Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34824484›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2020

Optimal Sparse Linear Prediction for Block-missing Multi-modality Data without Imputation.

Guan Yu, Quefeng Li, Dinggang Shen, Yufeng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Representation Retrieval Learning for Heterogeneous Data Integration.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sample-wise Combined Missing Effect Model with Penalization.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guan YuDepartment of Biostatistics, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Quefeng LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Dinggang ShenDepartment of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He is also affiliated with the Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea.
Yufeng LiuDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, Department of Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, Carolina Center for Genome Science, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE, KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Unlocking complex co-expression network using graphical modelsR01GM126550 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIU, YUFENG · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern scientific research, data are often collected from multiple modalities. Since different modalities could provide complementary information, statistical prediction methods using multi-modality data could deliver better prediction performance than using single modality data. However, one special challenge for using multi-modality data is related to block-missing data. In practice, due to dropouts or the high cost of measures, the observations of a certain modality can be missing completely for some subjects. In this paper, we propose a new DIrect Sparse regression procedure using COvariance from Multi-modality data (DISCOM). Our proposed DISCOM method includes two steps to find the optimal linear prediction of a continuous response variable using block-missing multi-modality predictors. In the first step, rather than deleting or imputing missing data, we make use of all available information to estimate the covariance matrix of the predictors and the cross-covariance vector between the predictors and the response variable. The proposed new estimate of the covariance matrix is a linear combination of the identity matrix, the estimates of the intra-modality covariance matrix and the cross-modality covariance matrix. Flexible estimates for both the sub-Gaussian and heavy-tailed cases are considered. In the second step, based on the estimated covariance matrix and the estimated cross-covariance vector, an extended Lasso-type estimator is used to deliver a sparse estimate of the coefficients in the optimal linear prediction. The number of samples that are effectively used by DISCOM is the minimum number of samples with available observations from two modalities, which can be much larger than the number of samples with complete observations from all modalities. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by theoretical studies, simulated examples, and a real application from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The comparison between DISCOM and some existing methods also indicates the advantages of our proposed method.

Indexed as

Block-missingHuber’s M-estimateLassoMulti-modalityPredictionSparse regression

Identifiers

PMID34824484
PMCPMC8612700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.