Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34824225›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Gene editing enables rapid engineering of complex antibiotic assembly lines.

Wei Li Thong, Yingxin Zhang, Ying Zhuo, Katherine J Robins, Joanna K Fyans, Abigail J Herbert, Brian J C Law, Jason Micklefield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Application of multiple genomic-editing technologies inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Multiple Pathways Impact Swarming Motility ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wei Li Thong *Department of Chemistry and Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Yingxin Zhang *Department of Chemistry and Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Ying Zhuo *Department of Chemistry and Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Katherine J RobinsDepartment of Chemistry and Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5049-4246
Joanna K FyansDepartment of Chemistry and Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Abigail J HerbertDepartment of Chemistry and Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Brian J C LawDepartment of Chemistry and Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Jason MicklefieldDepartment of Chemistry and Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK. jason.micklefield@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8951-4873

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L013754/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N023536/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Re-engineering biosynthetic assembly lines, including nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) and related megasynthase enzymes, is a powerful route to new antibiotics and other bioactive natural products that are too complex for chemical synthesis. However, engineering megasynthases is very challenging using current methods. Here, we describe how CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can be exploited to rapidly engineer one of the most complex megasynthase assembly lines in nature, the 2.0 MDa NRPS enzymes that deliver the lipopeptide antibiotic enduracidin. Gene editing was used to exchange subdomains within the NRPS, altering substrate selectivity, leading to ten new lipopeptide variants in good yields. In contrast, attempts to engineer the same NRPS using a conventional homologous recombination-mediated gene knockout and complementation approach resulted in only traces of new enduracidin variants. In addition to exchanging subdomains within the enduracidin NRPS, subdomains from a range of NRPS enzymes of diverse bacterial origins were also successfully utilized.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingLipopeptidesMultienzyme ComplexesMutationPeptides, CyclicPeptide SynthasesProtein DomainsStreptomycesSynthetic BiologyAnti-Bacterial AgentsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9LipopeptidesMultienzyme Complexesnon-ribosomal peptide synthasePeptides, CyclicPeptide Synthases

Identifiers

PMID34824225
PMCPMC8616955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.