Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34824151›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie

Urinary catheter use in patients with hip fracture: Are current guidelines appropriate? A retrospective review.

Sruthi Thomas, Nicole Harris, Johanna Dobransky, George Grammatopoulos, Kathleen Gartke, Allan Liew, Steven Papp

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05354921 (Hip Fracture Patient and the Use of IndwElling vs IntermittEnt Catheterization Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05354921 naunknown statusnot on this map

Hip Fracture Patient and the Use of IndwElling vs IntermittEnt Catheterization Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorOttawa Hospital Research InstituteRan2022 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsUrogenital, Urinary Tract Infections, Hip Fractures, Catheter ComplicationsArmsIndwelling Catheter, Intermittent Catheterization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sruthi ThomasFrom the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont.
Nicole HarrisFrom the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont.
Johanna DobranskyFrom the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont.
George GrammatopoulosFrom the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont.
Kathleen GartkeFrom the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont.
Allan LiewFrom the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont.
Steven PappFrom the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. spapp@toh.ca.
Ottawa Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines for urinary catheterization in patients with hip fracture recommend limiting catheter use and using intermittent catheterization preferentially to avoid complications such as urinary tract infection (UTI) and postoperative urinary retention (POUR). We aimed to compare current practices to clinical guidelines, describe the incidence of POUR and UTI, and determine factors that increase the risk of these complications.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with hip fracture who presented to a single large tertiary care centre in southeastern Ontario between November 2015 and October 2017. Data collected included comorbidities, catheter use and length of stay. We compared catheter use to guidelines, and investigated the incidence of and risk factors for POUR and UTI.

resultsWe reviewed the charts of 583 patients, of whom 450 (77.2%) were treated with a catheter, primarily indwelling (416 [92.4%]). Postoperative urinary retention developed in 98 patients (16.8%); however, it did not affect length of stay (

conclusionIndwelling catheters were used frequently, which suggests low compliance with clinical guidelines. Longer duration of catheter use led to higher rates of UTI and POUR. Further investigation of the reasons for the common use of indwelling rather than intermittent catheterization is needed.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBacteriuriaCatheters, IndwellingFemaleHip FracturesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUrinary Catheterization

Identifiers

PMID34824151
PMCPMC8628842
OpenAlexW3216022257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.