ArticleFamily medicine and community health2021
Developing and testing an automated qualitative assistant (AQUA) to support qualitative analysis.
Article in Family medicine and community health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Large Language Models into Qualitative Methods in Health Services Research: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Research square · 2026Article
- Large language models for deductive qualitative content analysis in dementia-focused embedded pragmatic clinical trials: A comparative methodological study.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- AI versus human coding of NIH grant abstracts.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparing GPT-4 and Human Researchers in Health Care Data Analysis: Qualitative Description Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Augmented Qualitative Analysis: The Way of the Future?Qualitative health research · 2024Article
- Potential of artificial intelligence in injury prevention research and practice.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2024Article
- Leveraging artificial intelligence to advance implementation science: potential opportunities and cautions.Implementation science : IS · 2024Article
- Paradigm shifts: exploring AI's influence on qualitative inquiry and analysis.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2024Article
- User feedback on the NHS test & Trace Service during COVID-19: The use of machine learning to analyse free-text data from 37,914 England adults.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyze large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Qualitative research remains underused, in part due to the time and cost of annotating qualitative data (coding). Artificial intelligence (AI) has been suggested as a means to reduce those burdens, and has been used in exploratory studies to reduce the burden of coding. However, methods to date use AI analytical techniques that lack transparency, potentially limiting acceptance of results. We developed an automated
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.