Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34824122›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Point-of-care testing in a high-income country paediatric emergency department: a qualitative study in Sweden.

Reza Rasti, Johanna Brännström, Andreas Mårtensson, Ingela Zenk, Jesper Gantelius, Giulia Gaudenzi, Helle Mölsted Alvesson, Tobias Alfvén

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Transformative impact of point-of-care testing in critical care.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Reza RastiDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden reza.rasti@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-7816-8338
Johanna BrännströmDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andreas MårtenssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, International Maternal and Child Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ingela ZenkSachs' Children and Youth Hospital, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jesper GanteliusDivision of Nanobiotechnology, Department of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.
Giulia GaudenziDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4923-6965
Helle Mölsted Alvesson *Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tobias Alfvén *Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SESachs' Children and Youth Hospital · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn many resource-limited health systems, point-of-care tests (POCTs) are the only means for clinical patient sample analyses. However, the speed and simplicity of POCTs also makes their use appealing to clinicians in high-income countries (HICs), despite greater laboratory accessibility. Although also part of the clinical routine in HICs, clinician perceptions of the utility of POCTs are relatively unknown in such settings as compared with others. In a Swedish paediatric emergency department (PED) where POCT use is routine, we aimed to characterise healthcare providers' perspectives on the clinical utility of POCTs and explore their implementation in the local setting; to discuss and compare such perspectives, to those reported in other settings; and finally, to gather requests for ideal novel POCTs.

designQualitative focus group discussions study. A data-driven content analysis approach was used for analysis.

settingThe PED of a secondary paediatric hospital in Stockholm, Sweden.

participantsTwenty-four healthcare providers clinically active at the PED were enrolled in six focus groups.

resultsA range of POCTs was routinely used. The emerging theme

conclusionDespite their clinical integration, deficient implementation routines limit the benefits of POCT services to this well-resourced paediatric clinic. As such deficiencies are shared with other settings, it is suggested that some characteristics of POCTs and of their utility are less related to resource level and more to policy deficiency. To address this, we propose the appointment of skilled laboratory personnel as ambassadors to hospital clinics offering POCT services, to ensure higher utility of such services.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPoint-of-Care TestingChildFocus GroupsHumansPoint-of-Care SystemsQualitative ResearchSwedenpaediatric A&E and ambulatory carepaediatricsprotocols & guidelinespublic healthqualitative researchquality in healthcare

Identifiers

PMID34824122
PMCPMC8627407
OpenAlexW3216612706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.