ReviewTrends in biochemical sciences2022
Broadening access to cryoEM through centralized facilities.
Review in Trends in biochemical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Cryo-EM and Supervised Machine Learning Enable Reproducible Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles and Co-Isolating Particles.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Article
- Structure first - exploration and discovery with cryo-electron microscopy.Journal of cell science · 2026Review
- The big chill: Growth ofQRB discovery · 2024Review
- Applications of microscopy and small angle scattering techniques for the characterisation of supramolecular gels.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2024Review
- Scaling up cryo-EM for biology and chemistry: The journey from niche technology to mainstream method.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2023Review
- Structural advances toward understanding the catalytic activity and conformational dynamics of modular nonribosomal peptide synthetases.Natural product reports · 2023Review
- Big data in contemporary electron microscopy: challenges and opportunities in data transfer, compute and management.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2023Review
- Structural insights into the HNF4 biology.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Recent advances in infectious disease research using cryo-electron tomography.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
- Practices for running a research-oriented shared cryo-EM facility.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Editorial: Methods in structural biology: Cryo-electron microscopy.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryoEM) uses images of frozen hydrated biological specimens to produce macromolecular structures, opening up previously inaccessible levels of biological organization to high-resolution structural analysis. CryoEM has the potential for broad impact in biomedical research, including basic cell, molecular, and structural biology, and increasingly in drug discovery and vaccine development. Recent advances have led to the expansion of molecular and cellular structure determination at an exponential rate. National and regional centers have emerged to support this growth by increasing the accessibility of cryoEM throughout the biomedical research community. Through cooperation and synergy, these centers form a network of resources that accelerate the adoption of best practices for access and training and establish sustainable workflows to build future research capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.