Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34823593›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2021

Disentangling environmental effects in microbial association networks.

Ina Maria Deutschmann, Gipsi Lima-Mendez, Anders K Krabberød, Jeroen Raes, Sergio M Vallina, Karoline Faust, Ramiro Logares

Erratum issuedAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Learning functional groups in complex microbiomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ina Maria DeutschmannInstitute of Marine Sciences, CSIC, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. ina.m.deutschmann@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3512-261X
Gipsi Lima-MendezResearch Unit in Biology of Microorganisms (URBM), University of Namur, 61 Rue de Bruxelles, 5000, Namur, Belgium.
Anders K KrabberødDepartment of Biosciences/Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (EVOGENE), University of Oslo, p.b. 1066 Blindern, N-0316, Oslo, Norway.
Jeroen RaesVIB Center for Microbiology, Herestraat 49-1028, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Sergio M VallinaSpanish Institute of Oceanography (IEO - CSIC), Ave Principe de Asturias 70 Bis, 33212, Gijon, Spain.
Karoline Faust *KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, Laboratory of Molecular Bacteriology, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. karoline.faust@kuleuven.be.
Ramiro Logares *Institute of Marine Sciences, CSIC, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. ramiro.logares@icm.csic.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEcological interactions among microorganisms are fundamental for ecosystem function, yet they are mostly unknown or poorly understood. High-throughput-omics can indicate microbial interactions through associations across time and space, which can be represented as association networks. Associations could result from either ecological interactions between microorganisms, or from environmental selection, where the association is environmentally driven. Therefore, before downstream analysis and interpretation, we need to distinguish the nature of the association, particularly if it is due to environmental selection or not.

resultsWe present EnDED (environmentally driven edge detection), an implementation of four approaches as well as their combination to predict which links between microorganisms in an association network are environmentally driven. The four approaches are sign pattern, overlap, interaction information, and data processing inequality. We tested EnDED on networks from simulated data of 50 microorganisms. The networks contained on average 50 nodes and 1087 edges, of which 60 were true interactions but 1026 false associations (i.e., environmentally driven or due to chance). Applying each method individually, we detected a moderate to high number of environmentally driven edges-87% sign pattern and overlap, 67% interaction information, and 44% data processing inequality. Combining these methods in an intersection approach resulted in retaining more interactions, both true and false (32% of environmentally driven associations). After validation with the simulated datasets, we applied EnDED on a marine microbial network inferred from 10 years of monthly observations of microbial-plankton abundance. The intersection combination predicted that 8.3% of the associations were environmentally driven, while individual methods predicted 24.8% (data processing inequality), 25.7% (interaction information), and up to 84.6% (sign pattern as well as overlap). The fraction of environmentally driven edges among negative microbial associations in the real network increased rapidly with the number of environmental factors.

conclusionsTo reach accurate hypotheses about ecological interactions, it is important to determine, quantify, and remove environmentally driven associations in marine microbial association networks. For that, EnDED offers up to four individual methods as well as their combination. However, especially for the intersection combination, we suggest using EnDED with other strategies to reduce the number of false associations and consequently the number of potential interaction hypotheses. Video abstract.

Indexed as

EcosystemMicrobial ConsortiaClimatePlanktonAssociation networkEffect of indirect dependenciesEnvironmentally driven edge detectionMicrobial interactions

Identifiers

PMID34823593
PMCPMC8620190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.