Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34823502›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical research methodology2021

Instrumental variable estimation for a time-varying treatment and a time-to-event outcome via structural nested cumulative failure time models.

Joy Shi, Sonja A Swanson, Peter Kraft, Bernard Rosner, Immaculata De Vivo, Miguel A Hernán

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical research methodology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joy ShiDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. joyshi@hsph.harvard.edu.
Sonja A SwansonDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Peter KraftDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Bernard RosnerDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Immaculata De VivoDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Miguel A HernánDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn many applications of instrumental variable (IV) methods, the treatments of interest are intrinsically time-varying and outcomes of interest are failure time outcomes. A common example is Mendelian randomization (MR), which uses genetic variants as proposed IVs. In this article, we present a novel application of g-estimation of structural nested cumulative failure models (SNCFTMs), which can accommodate multiple measures of a time-varying treatment when modelling a failure time outcome in an IV analysis.

methodsA SNCFTM models the ratio of two conditional mean counterfactual outcomes at time k under two treatment strategies which differ only at an earlier time m. These models can be extended to accommodate inverse probability of censoring weights, and can be applied to case-control data. We also describe how the g-estimates of the SNCFTM parameters can be used to calculate marginal cumulative risks under nondynamic treatment strategies. We examine the performance of this method using simulated data, and present an application of these models by conducting an MR study of alcohol intake and endometrial cancer using longitudinal observational data from the Nurses' Health Study.

resultsOur simulations found that estimates from SNCFTMs which used an IV approach were similar to those obtained from SNCFTMs which adjusted for confounders, and similar to those obtained from the g-formula approach when the outcome was rare. In our data application, the cumulative risk of endometrial cancer from age 45 to age 72 under the "never drink" strategy (4.0%) was similar to that under the "always ½ drink per day" strategy (4.3%).

conclusionsSNCFTMs can be used to conduct MR and other IV analyses with time-varying treatments and failure time outcomes.

Indexed as

Research DesignCase-Control StudiesHumansMiddle AgedProbabilityG-estimationInstrumental variableMendelian randomizationStructural nested models

Identifiers

PMID34823502
PMCPMC8620657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.