Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34823313›Full record

ReviewClinics in shoulder and elbow2022

Can platelet-rich plasma injections provide better pain relief and functional outcomes in persons with common shoulder diseases: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Apurba Barman, Archana Mishra, Rituparna Maiti, Jagannatha Sahoo, Kaustav Basu Thakur, Sreeja Kamala Sasidharan

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Differential Diagnosis of Elbow Pain.Ewha medical journal · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The blind spot and challenges in pain management.Journal of Yeungnam medical science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Apurba BarmanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Archana MishraDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rituparna MaitiDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Jagannatha SahooDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Kaustav Basu ThakurDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sreeja Kamala SasidharanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in the treatment of common shoulder diseases.

methodsThe PubMed, Medline, and Central databases and trial registries were searched from their inception to October 2020 for randomized controlled trials of autologous PRP injections for shoulder diseases versus placebo or any control intervention. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis, and reporting of findings. The primary outcome was pain intensity (visual analog scale), and secondary outcomes were changes in function and quality of life (QoL).

resultsA total of 17 randomized controlled trials of PRP versus control were analyzed. From 8-12 weeks to ≥1 year, PRP injections were associated with better pain relief and functional outcomes than control interventions. PRP injections were also associated with greater QoL, with an effect size of 2.61 (95% confidence interval, 2.01-14.17) at medium-term follow-up. Compared with placebo and corticosteroid injections, PRP injections provided better pain relief and functional improvement. In subgroup analyses, trials in which PRP was prepared by the double centrifugation technique, the platelet concentration in the PRP was enriched ≥5 times, leucocyte-rich PRP was used, or an activating agent was used before application reported the most effective pain relief at 6-7 months.

conclusionsPRP injections could provide better pain relief and functional outcomes than other treatments for persons presenting with common shoulder diseases. PRP injections have a greater capacity to improve shoulder-related QoL than other interventions.

Indexed as

InjectionsMeta-analysisPainPlatelet-rich plasmaShoulder

Identifiers

PMID34823313
PMCPMC8907495
OpenAlexW3216037414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.