Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34823272›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2022

Evidence for host-microbiome co-evolution in apple.

Ahmed Abdelfattah, Ayco J M Tack, Birgit Wasserman, Jia Liu, Gabriele Berg, John Norelli, Samir Droby, Michael Wisniewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Metagenomic Analysis of Wild Apple (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Unraveling the Mechanism of the Endophytic Bacterial StrainInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmed AbdelfattahInstitute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 12, Graz, 8010, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6090-7200
Ayco J M TackDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 20A, Stockholm, SE-106 91, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3550-1070
Birgit WassermanInstitute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 12, Graz, 8010, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6270-1345
Jia LiuChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology, College of Landscape Architecture and Life Sciences, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Yongchuan, Chongquing, 402160, China.
Gabriele BergInstitute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 12, Graz, 8010, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9423-3101
John NorelliAppalachian Fruit Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Kearneysville, WV, 25430, USA.
Samir DrobyDepartment of Postharvest Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Institute, PO Box 15159, Rishon LeZion, 7505101, Israel.
Michael WisniewskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 220 Ag Quad Ln, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7481-5590

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants evolved in association with a diverse community of microorganisms. The effect of plant phylogeny and domestication on host-microbiome co-evolutionary dynamics are poorly understood. Here we examined the effect of domestication and plant lineage on the composition of the endophytic microbiome of 11 Malus species, representing three major groups: domesticated apple (M. domestica), wild apple progenitors, and wild Malus species. The endophytic community of M. domestica and its wild progenitors showed higher microbial diversity and abundance than wild Malus species. Heirloom and modern cultivars harbored a distinct community composition, though the difference was not significant. A community-wide Bayesian model revealed that the endophytic microbiome of domesticated apple is an admixture of its wild progenitors, with clear evidence for microbiome introgression, especially for the bacterial community. We observed a significant correlation between the evolutionary distance of Malus species and their microbiome. This study supports co-evolution between Malus species and their microbiome during domestication. This finding has major implications for future breeding programs and our understanding of the evolution of plants and their microbiomes.

Indexed as

MalusMicrobiotaBayes TheoremDomesticationPhylogenyPlant Breedingbacterial communityendophytesfungal communitymicrobial introgressionmicrobiotaphylosymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID34823272
PMCPMC9299473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.