Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34823179›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2022

Molecular and phenotypic characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from commercial broilers and native chickens.

Thotsapol Thomrongsuwannakij, Ruethai Narinthorn, Tanakamol Mahawan, Patrick J Blackall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Emulsion ContainingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Avian PathogenicVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Functional Characterization of a NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Bactericidal Activities of Nanoemulsion ContainingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Quinolone resistance inVeterinary world · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Isolation and Characterization of a NovelAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Isolation and Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sangyod rice bran extract enhancesVeterinary world · 2022
    Article
  16. High-Frequency Detection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thotsapol ThomrongsuwannakijAkkhraratchakumari Veterinary College, Walailak University, Nakorn Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand; One Health Research Center, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand. Electronic address: thotsapol.th@wu.ac.th.
Ruethai NarinthornAkkhraratchakumari Veterinary College, Walailak University, Nakorn Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand; One Health Research Center, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
Tanakamol MahawanAkkhraratchakumari Veterinary College, Walailak University, Nakorn Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand; One Health Research Center, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
Patrick J BlackallQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4067, Australia.
Walailak University · THThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies have examined avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) from commercial broilers but few have examined isolates from native chickens. This study compared APEC isolates from commercial broilers and native chickens in regard to the phylogenetic group and the phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance profiles. From 100 suspect colibacillosis cases in both commercial broilers and native chickens, a total of 90 broiler isolates and 42 native chicken isolates were identified as E. coli by biochemical tests. Phylogenetic grouping revealed that 90 broiler APEC isolates belonged to A group (5.56%), B1 group (22.22%), B2 group (31.11%), and D group (41.11%). The 42 native chicken APEC isolates belonged to A group (35.71%), B1 group (26.19%), B2 group (30.95%), and D group (7.14%). The difference in the allocation to groups A and D of the 2 isolate types was significant (P < 0.05). The APEC broiler isolates had a significantly higher multidrug-resistant (MDR) rate (80%) than the native chicken isolates (14.29%) (P < 0.05). The APEC broiler isolates demonstrated significantly higher resistance rates than the native chicken isolates for amoxicillin (98.89%; 78.57% respectively), chloramphenicol (42.2%; 9.5%), enrofloxacin (68.9%; 7.1%), gentamicin (11.1%; 0%), nalidixic acid (72.2%; 7.1%), sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim (45.6%; 2.4%), and tetracycline (88.9%; 76.2%) (P < 0.05). The APEC broiler isolates had a significantly higher presence compared with the native chicken isolates of the following resistance genes:- by bla

Indexed as

ChickensEscherichia coliAnimalsPhylogenyantimicrobial resistanceavian pathogenic Escherichia colicommercial broilernative chickenresistance gene

Identifiers

PMID34823179
PMCPMC8627976
OpenAlexW3205113617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.