Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34822844›Full record

ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2022

Evaluating Cognitive-Linguistic Approaches to Interventions for Aphasia Within the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System.

Mary Boyle, Jean K Gordon, Stacy M Harnish, Swathi Kiran, Nadine Martin, Miranda L Rose, Christos Salis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary BoyleDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Montclair State University, Bloomfield, NJ. Electronic address: boylem@montclair.edu.
Jean K GordonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Stacy M HarnishDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Swathi KiranDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Nadine MartinDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Miranda L RoseCentre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Christos SalisSchool of Education, Communication, and Language Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Funding

Predicting rehabilitation outcomes in bilingual aphasia using computational modelingU01DC014922 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KIRAN, SWATHI, MIIKKULAINEN, RISTO · 2016 to 2020
$3.5M
Functional reorganization of the language and domain-general multiple demand systems in aphasiaR01DC016950 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA, KIRAN, SWATHI · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016950NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC014922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) provides a framework to identify specific components of treatments developed within various rehabilitation disciplines (eg, physical, occupational, or speech-language therapy). Furthermore, this framework offers the opportunity to identify the target and active ingredients of a therapy approach as well as the mechanism of action by which it is hypothesized to effect change in abilities or functions. In this article, we apply the RTSS framework to the characterization of a sample of treatments for aphasia that are based on cognitive-linguistic models of language processing. Our discussion of these applications centers on the benefits of this classification system and additional criteria to consider when evaluating cognitive-linguistic treatments for aphasia.

Indexed as

AphasiaCognitionHumansLanguageLinguisticsSpeech TherapyAphasiaRehabilitationTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID34822844
PMCPMC13281273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.