Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34822563›Full record

ArticleToxins2021

Morphology of the Cutaneous Poison and Mucous Glands in Amphibians with Particular Emphasis on Caecilians (

Beatriz Mauricio, Pedro Luiz Mailho-Fontana, Luciana Almeida Sato, Flavia Ferreira Barbosa, Renato Mancini Astray, Alexander Kupfer, Edmund D Brodie, Carlos Jared, Marta Maria Antoniazzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Beatriz MauricioLaboratory of Structural Biology, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05509-000, Brazil.
Pedro Luiz Mailho-FontanaLaboratory of Structural Biology, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05509-000, Brazil.
Luciana Almeida SatoLaboratory of Structural Biology, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05509-000, Brazil.
Flavia Ferreira BarbosaMultipurpose Laboratory, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05503-000, Brazil.
Renato Mancini AstrayMultipurpose Laboratory, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05503-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6983-5298
Alexander KupferDepartment of Zoology, State Museum of Natural History, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany.
Edmund D BrodieDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.
Carlos JaredLaboratory of Structural Biology, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05509-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9117-6276
Marta Maria AntoniazziLaboratory of Structural Biology, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05509-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0575-7921
Instituto Butantan · BRUtah State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caecilians (order Gymnophiona) are apodan, snake-like amphibians, usually with fossorial habits, constituting one of the most unknown groups of terrestrial vertebrates. As in orders Anura (frogs, tree frogs and toads) and Caudata (salamanders and newts), the caecilian skin is rich in mucous glands, responsible for body lubrication, and poison glands, producing varied toxins used in defence against predators and microorganisms. Whereas in anurans and caudatans skin gland morphology has been well studied, caecilian poison glands remain poorly elucidated. Here we characterised the skin gland morphology of the caecilian

Indexed as

AmphibiansAnimalsExocrine GlandsFemaleMaleMucusPoisonsPoisonsamphibiaGymnophionapoisonskin glandstoxins

Identifiers

PMID34822563
PMCPMC8617868
OpenAlexW3211468913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.