Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34822465›Full record

ReviewMarine drugs2021

Halophilic Carotenoids and Breast Cancer: From Salt Marshes to Biomedicine.

Micaela Giani, Yoel Genaro Montoyo-Pujol, Gloria Peiró, Rosa María Martínez-Espinosa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Marine drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strategies for Metabolic Engineering ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Micronutrient Status and Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Extremophiles in a changing world.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2024
    Review
  10. Some novel bioactivities ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Optimization of CApplied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Micaela GianiBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Division, Agrochemistry and Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Alicante, Ap. 99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7558-7278
Yoel Genaro Montoyo-PujolBreast Cancer Research Group, Research Unit, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL) Hospital General Universitario, Pintor Baeza 12, E-03010 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3169-0924
Gloria PeiróDepartment of Pathology, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL) Hospital General Universitario, Pintor Baeza 12, E-03010 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2899-2908
Rosa María Martínez-EspinosaBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Division, Agrochemistry and Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Alicante, Ap. 99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2679-135X
Instituto de investigación sanitaria y biomédica de AlicanteUniversity of Alicante · ES

Funding

Generalitat Valenciana PROMETEO/2021/055Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness RTI2018-099860-B-I00University of Alicante VIGROB-309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the leading cause of death among women worldwide. Over the years, oxidative stress has been linked to the onset and progression of cancer. In addition to the classical histological classification, breast carcinomas are classified into phenotypes according to hormone receptors (estrogen receptor-RE-/progesterone receptor-PR) and growth factor receptor (human epidermal growth factor receptor-HER2) expression. Luminal tumors (ER/PR-positive/HER2-negative) are present in older patients with a better outcome. However, patients with HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ER/PR/HER2-negative) subtypes still represent highly aggressive behavior, metastasis, poor prognosis, and drug resistance. Therefore, new alternative therapies have become an urgent clinical need. In recent years, anticancer agents based on natural products have been receiving huge interest. In particular, carotenoids are natural compounds present in fruits and vegetables, but algae, bacteria, and archaea also produce them. The antioxidant properties of carotenoids have been studied during the last years due to their potential in preventing and treating multiple diseases, including cancer. Although the effect of carotenoids on breast cancer during in vitro and in vivo studies is promising, clinical trials are still inconclusive. The haloarchaeal carotenoid bacterioruberin holds great promise to the future of biomedicine due to its particular structure, and antioxidant activity. However, much work remains to be performed to draw firm conclusions. This review summarizes the current knowledge on pre-clinical and clinical analysis on the use of carotenoids as chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agents in breast cancer, highlighting the most recent results regarding the use of bacterioruberin from haloarchaea.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsAntineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsBreast NeoplasmsCarotenoidsFemaleHumansWetlandsAntineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsCarotenoidsantioxidantbacterioruberinbreast cancercarotenoidsoxidative stresspro-oxidant

Identifiers

PMID34822465
PMCPMC8625793
OpenAlexW3207184385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.