Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34822367›Full record

ArticleMedicines (Basel, Switzerland)2021

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Medical Imaging Case Volumes in Aseer Region: A Retrospective Study.

Magbool Alelyani, Ali Alghamdi, Nasser Shubayr, Yazeed Alashban, Hajar Almater, Sultan Alamri, Ahmad Joman Alghamdi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicines (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Trends in Academic Productivity Among Radiologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Magbool AlelyaniDepartment Radiological Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6597-5090
Ali AlghamdiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, The University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47713, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9292-8575
Nasser ShubayrDiagnostic Radiology Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5866-3809
Yazeed AlashbanDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0857-524X
Hajar AlmaterDepartment Radiological Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.
Sultan AlamriDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad Joman AlghamdiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8285-6915
Taif University · SAKing Khalid University · SAJazan University · SAKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 has had a significant impact on global health systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate how imaging volumes and imaging types in radiology departments have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic across different locations.

methodsImaging volumes in the Aseer region (in the south of Saudi Arabia) across main hospitals were reviewed retrospectively including all cases referred from different locations (outpatient, inpatient and emergency departments). Data for years 2019 and 2020 were compared. The mean monthly cases were compared using a

resultsThe total imaging volumes in 2019 were 205,805 compared to 159,107 in 2020 with a 22.7% overall reduction. A substantial decline was observed in both the April to June and the July to September periods of approximately 42.9% and 44.4%, respectively. With respect to location, between April and June, the greatest decline was observed in outpatient departments (76% decline), followed by emergency departments (25% decline), and the least impact was observed in inpatient departments, with only 6.8% decline over the same period. According to modality type, the greatest decreases were reported in nuclear medicine, ultrasound, MRI, and mammography, by 100%, 76%, 74%, and 66%, respectively. Our results show a statistically significant (

conclusionThere has been a significant decline in radiology volumes due to COVID-19. The overall reduction in radiology volumes was dependent on the stage/period of lockdown, location, and imaging modality.

Indexed as

COVID-19medical imagingradiologySaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID34822367
PMCPMC8622168
OpenAlexW3213945167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.