SynthesisInvestigacion y educacion en enfermeria2021
Measurement of Practices-Knowledge-Attitudes of the Nursing Process: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer pain knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals: A systematic review of surveys and their measurement properties.British journal of pain · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Healthcare Workers on Cervical Cancer Screening in Rural Healthcare Facilities of the Eastern Cape.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nursing practice in relation to older people's fundamentals of care in nursing homes: An exploratory design.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Measuring readiness for nurse-led shared decision making in clinical practice: development and first testing of the RSDM-N scale.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Development and psychometric testing of a competency of nursing process questionnaire.International journal of nursing sciences · 2023Article
- Nurses' Knowledge and Perception in the Utilisation of the Nursing Process in Patient Care: A Qualitative Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo analyze the literature available on the psychometric properties of the instruments to measure knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the nursing care process.
methodsThis was a narrative-type review conducted by following the recommendations of the PRISMA declaration. The search strategy was executed in two stages; through the search in databases by two reviewers and - thereafter - three reviewers identified independently the studies and evaluated the methodological quality of the measurement instruments by using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) property checklist boxes.
resultsOf 71 studies identified for the full-text review, only seven complied with the inclusion criteria that represent four instruments (Q-DIO, D-CATCH, NP-CDSS, PNP). It was found that the instruments continue in their validation and appropriation processes to reality in health services.
conclusionsIn spite of the evident evolution of the instruments to evaluate the implementation of the nursing care process, the need is still valid for an instrument that measures aspects of knowledge, attitudes, and practices in every stage of the process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.