ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2022
Large discrepancy in glycaemic control appropriateness in geriatric patients with type 2 diabetes according to major clinical practice guidelines.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn geriatric patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), appropriate glycaemic control is crucial to avoid overtreatment and hypoglycaemia. This study compared glycaemic control appropriateness across three major clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).
methodsRetrospective study of geriatric older inpatients with T2D and glucose-lowering treatment before admission. Patients were classified as appropriately treated, overtreated or undertreated using CPGs from Diabetes Canada 2018 (DC18), the Endocrine Society 2019 (ES19) and the American Diabetes Association 2021 (ADA21).
resultsOf the 318 geriatric patients (median age 84 years, 54% women, 66% in poor health), 46%, 25% and 82% were appropriately treated, while 38%, 57% and 0% were overtreated, based on DC18, ES19 and ADA21, respectively.
conclusionLarge discrepancy of glycaemic control appropriateness was detected across these CPGs and concerned mainly overtreatment. This finding relates to the absence in ADA21 of a lower HbA1c value, which may be an obstacle to the prevention of hypoglycaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34822142What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.