Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34822117›Full record

ReviewAmbio2022

Shine a light: Under-ice light and its ecological implications in a changing Arctic Ocean.

Giulia Castellani, Gaëlle Veyssière, Michael Karcher, Julienne Stroeve, S Neil Banas, A Heather Bouman, S Andrew Brierley, Stacey Connan, Finlo Cottier, Fabian Große and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ambio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The diatomApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Giulia CastellaniAlfred-Wegener-Institute Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar und Meeresforschung, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany. giulia.castellani@awi.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6151-015X
Gaëlle VeyssièreBritish Antarctic Survey, High Cross Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK.
Michael KarcherAlfred-Wegener-Institute Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar und Meeresforschung, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany.
Julienne StroeveUniversity College London, Gower St, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
S Neil BanasUniversity of Strathclyde, Livingstone Tower, 26 Richmond Street, Glasgow, G1 1XH, UK.
A Heather BoumanUniversity of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3AN, UK.
S Andrew BrierleyPelagic Ecology Research Group, Scottish Oceans Institute, Gatty Marine Laboratory, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, Scotland, UK.
Stacey ConnanUniversity of Strathclyde, Livingstone Tower, 26 Richmond Street, Glasgow, G1 1XH, UK.
Finlo CottierScottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll and Bute, PA37 1QA, Scotland, UK.
Fabian GroßeUniversity of Strathclyde, Livingstone Tower, 26 Richmond Street, Glasgow, G1 1XH, UK.
Laura HobbsUniversity of Strathclyde, Livingstone Tower, 26 Richmond Street, Glasgow, G1 1XH, UK.
Christian KatleinAlfred-Wegener-Institute Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar und Meeresforschung, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany.
Bonnie LightUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
David McKeeUniversity of Strathclyde, Livingstone Tower, 26 Richmond Street, Glasgow, G1 1XH, UK.
Andrew OrkneyUniversity of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3AN, UK.
Roland ProudPelagic Ecology Research Group, Scottish Oceans Institute, Gatty Marine Laboratory, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, Scotland, UK.
Vibe Schourup-KristensenDepartment of Applied Marine Ecology and Modeling, Aarhus University, Nordre Ringgade 1, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 03F0810ABundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 03V01465Natural Environment Research Council NE/P005721/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/P00573X/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/P005985/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/R012636/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/R012679/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/R012849/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Arctic marine ecosystem is shaped by the seasonality of the solar cycle, spanning from 24-h light at the sea surface in summer to 24-h darkness in winter. The amount of light available for under-ice ecosystems is the result of different physical and biological processes that affect its path through atmosphere, snow, sea ice and water. In this article, we review the present state of knowledge of the abiotic (clouds, sea ice, snow, suspended matter) and biotic (sea ice algae and phytoplankton) controls on the underwater light field. We focus on how the available light affects the seasonal cycle of primary production (sympagic and pelagic) and discuss the sensitivity of ecosystems to changes in the light field based on model simulations. Lastly, we discuss predicted future changes in under-ice light as a consequence of climate change and their potential ecological implications, with the aim of providing a guide for future research.

Indexed as

EcosystemIce CoverArctic RegionsOceans and SeasPhytoplanktonArctic ecosystemArctic OceanLight transmissionPhytoplanktonPrimary productionSea ice algae

Identifiers

PMID34822117
PMCPMC8692516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.