Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34822003›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Comparative study of royal jelly, propolis, and photobiomodulation therapies in 5-fluorouracil-related oral mucositis in rats.

Mara Luana Batista Severo, Stéfanie Thieme, Felipe Martins Silveira, Raquel Padilha Martins Tavares, Amanda Katarinny Goes Gonzaga, Silvana Maria Zucolotto, Aurigena Antunes de Araújo, Marco Antonio Trevizani Martins, Manoela Domingues Martins, Éricka Janine Dantas da Silveira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Royal Jelly: Biological Action and Health Benefits.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mara Luana Batista SeveroDentistry Department, Postgraduate Program in Dental Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande Norte, Av. Senador Salgado Filho, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 1787, Brazil.
Stéfanie ThiemeDepartment of Oral Pathology, Dental School, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Felipe Martins SilveiraDepartment of Oral Pathology, Dental School, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Raquel Padilha Martins TavaresDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Amanda Katarinny Goes GonzagaDepartment of Dentistry, UNIFACISA University Center, Campina Grande, PB, Brazil.
Silvana Maria ZucolottoDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Aurigena Antunes de AraújoDentistry Department, Postgraduate Program in Dental Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande Norte, Av. Senador Salgado Filho, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 1787, Brazil.
Marco Antonio Trevizani MartinsDepartment of Oral Pathology, Dental School, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Manoela Domingues MartinsDepartment of Oral Pathology, Dental School, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Éricka Janine Dantas da SilveiraDentistry Department, Postgraduate Program in Dental Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande Norte, Av. Senador Salgado Filho, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 1787, Brazil. ericka_janine@yahoo.com.br.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the effects and mechanisms of action of royal jelly (RJ) and propolis compared to photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) in an animal model of 5-fluorouracil-related oral mucositis (OM).

methodsSeventy-two male Wistar rats were randomly allocated to four groups (n = 18 each): control (no treatment), PBMT (intraoral laser, 6 J/cm

resultsTLC revealed the presence of large amounts of sucrose (Rf 0.34) in RJ and of flavonoids in propolis. Lower clinical OM scores were observed on day 8, and improved morphological data were observed on day 10 in the PBMT, RJ, and propolis groups (p < 0.05). On day 8, immunoexpression of pS6, pAKT, and NF-κB was increased compared to control. On day 14, reduced glutathione (GSH) antioxidant levels were increased in the propolis group compared to control (p < 0.05).

conclusionsOur results showed that RJ and propolis, as well as PBMT, are effective in the treatment of OM. Considering that some patients who develop OM do not have access to PBMT, the present study demonstrated that topical application of RJ and propolis may be an important alternative for the treatment of OM.

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyPropolisStomatitisAnimalsFatty AcidsFluorouracilHumansMaleRatsRats, WistarRoyal JellyFatty AcidsFluorouracilPropolisRoyal JellyOral mucositisOxidative stressPhytotherapicsSignaling pathwaysTreatment

Identifiers

PMID34822003
OpenAlexW3216557987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.