Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34821711›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2021

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Physical Health in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Litao Du, Xianliang Zhang, Ke Chen, Xiaoyu Ren, Si Chen, Qiang He

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A Bibliometric Analysis of High-Intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Litao DuSchool of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Xianliang ZhangSchool of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Ke ChenSchool of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Xiaoyu RenSchool of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Si ChenSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250102, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6041-1528
Qiang HeSchool of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7281-0200
Shandong University · CN

Funding

Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science Project 19YJCZH255the Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University 2020GN064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on physical health in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients has long been established, while the optimal exercise mode remains to be determined. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in CAD patients. Databases were searched up to December 2020. Twenty-five studies with 1272 participants were analyzed. The results showed that both HIIT and MICT induced significant VO

Indexed as

coronary artery diseaseexercise-based cardiac rehabilitationhigh-intensity interval trainingmoderate-intensity continuous training

Identifiers

PMID34821711
PMCPMC8622669
OpenAlexW3212968114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.