ArticleBiosensors2021
Breast Mass Classification Using Diverse Contextual Information and Convolutional Neural Network.
Article in Biosensors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An open codebase for enhancing transparency in deep learning-based breast cancer diagnosis utilizing CBIS-DDSM data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- MNet-10: A robust shallow convolutional neural network model performing ablation study on medical images assessing the effectiveness of applying optimal data augmentation technique.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Masses are one of the early signs of breast cancer, and the survival rate of women suffering from breast cancer can be improved if masses can be correctly identified as benign or malignant. However, their classification is challenging due to the similarity in texture patterns of both types of mass. The existing methods for this problem have low sensitivity and specificity. Based on the hypothesis that diverse contextual information of a mass region forms a strong indicator for discriminating benign and malignant masses and the idea of the ensemble classifier, we introduce a computer-aided system for this problem. The system uses multiple regions of interest (ROIs) encompassing a mass region for modeling diverse contextual information, a single ResNet-50 model (or its density-specific modification) as a backbone for local decisions, and stacking with SVM as a base model to predict the final decision. A data augmentation technique is introduced for fine-tuning the backbone model. The system was thoroughly evaluated on the benchmark CBIS-DDSM dataset using its provided data split protocol, and it achieved a sensitivity of 98.48% and a specificity of 92.31%. Furthermore, it was found that the system gives higher performance if it is trained and tested using the data from a specific breast density BI-RADS class. The system does not need to fine-tune/train multiple CNN models; it introduces diverse contextual information by multiple ROIs. The comparison shows that the method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods for classifying mass regions into benign and malignant. It will help radiologists reduce their burden and enhance their sensitivity in the prediction of malignant masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.